On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 03:17:03PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/slave-interface
> > b/Documentation/i2c/slave-interface
> > index 2dee4e2d62df19..61ed05cd95317f 100644
> > --- a/Document
Hi Wolfram,
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/slave-interface
> b/Documentation/i2c/slave-interface
> index 2dee4e2d62df19..61ed05cd95317f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/i2c/slave-interface
> +++ b/Documentation/i2c/slave-interface
> @@ -31,10 +3
On 2015-08-10 13:55, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> The result of the given .config does not matter as much. The point of
>> the warnings is that there are missing select statements in the Kconfig
>> files.
>
> For the I2C part, I think they should rather depend on I2C_MUX.
> Selecting I2C should be ra
> The result of the given .config does not matter as much. The point of
> the warnings is that there are missing select statements in the Kconfig
> files.
For the I2C part, I think they should rather depend on I2C_MUX.
Selecting I2C should be rare, like when you really need that PMIC to
boot.
Am 10.08.2015 um 13:12 schrieb Michal Marek:
> On 2015-08-10 11:14, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 10.08.2015 um 11:10 schrieb Lee Jones:
>>> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>>
Hi!
-next faces some build issues on UML because of unmet direct dependencies.
Mostly
On 2015-08-10 11:14, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 10.08.2015 um 11:10 schrieb Lee Jones:
>> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> -next faces some build issues on UML because of unmet direct dependencies.
>>> Mostly due to HAS_IOMEM and I2C.
>>>
>>> warning: (MEDIA_SUB
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:06:07PM +0200, Crt Mori wrote:
> On 10 August 2015 at 11:13, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> >
> > > This debate is what I wanted to have. The new Melexis sensor will be
> > > using it and since I think some others might also be using it in
> > > future I would rather put it t
On 10 August 2015 at 11:13, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>
> > This debate is what I wanted to have. The new Melexis sensor will be
> > using it and since I think some others might also be using it in
> > future I would rather put it to i2c. It is more i2c command than
> > sensor specific so I think it f
Am 10.08.2015 um 11:10 schrieb Lee Jones:
> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> -next faces some build issues on UML because of unmet direct dependencies.
>> Mostly due to HAS_IOMEM and I2C.
>>
>> warning: (MEDIA_SUBDRV_AUTOSELECT && VIDEO_CX231XX && INV_MPU6050_IIO)
>>
> This debate is what I wanted to have. The new Melexis sensor will be
> using it and since I think some others might also be using it in
> future I would rather put it to i2c. It is more i2c command than
> sensor specific so I think it fits into i2c.
There is no thing as 'I2C command'. There are
On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> -next faces some build issues on UML because of unmet direct dependencies.
> Mostly due to HAS_IOMEM and I2C.
>
> warning: (MEDIA_SUBDRV_AUTOSELECT && VIDEO_CX231XX && INV_MPU6050_IIO)
> selects I2C_MUX which has unmet direct dependencies
On 10 August 2015 at 09:26, Crt Mori wrote:
> On 9 August 2015 at 09:40, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 03:20:42PM +0200, Crt Mori wrote:
>>> If you want to send more than 1 byte as command to slave you need to go away
>>> from the smbus (which has a 8 bit command defined in speci
On 9 August 2015 at 09:40, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 03:20:42PM +0200, Crt Mori wrote:
>> If you want to send more than 1 byte as command to slave you need to go away
>> from the smbus (which has a 8 bit command defined in specification). i2c has
>> no such limitation in specif
13 matches
Mail list logo
