On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 04:17:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Well, I'm not quite sure why exactly everyone is so focused on probing here.
Probe deferral is really noisy even if it's working fine on a given
system so it's constantly being highlighted to people in a way that
other issues ar
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> I have been defaulting to the position that has been asserted by
> the device tree maintainters, that probe deferrals work just fine
> for at least the majority of cases (and is the message I have been
> sharing in my conference presentations
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:27:06PM -0700, Dustin Byford wrote:
> Add a stub for acpi_preset_companion(). Fixes build failures when
> acpi_preset_companion() is used and CONFIG_ACPI is not set.
>
> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg
> Signed-off-by: Dustin Byford
Waiting for Rafael's ack here...
> ---
CC: Mika
On Thursday, October 22, 2015 01:05:42 PM Ben Gardner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a custom Baytrail board with a M24C02 EEPROM attached to I2C bus 3.
> I am using coreboot/SeaBIOS, so I have complete control over the ACPI tables.
> I am using Linux 4.2.3.
>
> I have defined a EEPROM dev
On Friday, October 23, 2015 11:34:34 AM Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Tim Bird wrote:
> > On 10/22/2015 11:53 AM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> >> On 10/22/2015 7:44 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:05:11AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> >>