Re: [PATCH v4] at24: Support SMBus read/write of 16-bit devices

- Original Message - > From: "Jean Delvare" > Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 3:39:20 AM > > Hi Aaron, > > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 18:25:11 -0600 (CST), Aaron Sierra wrote: > > Previously, the at24 driver would bail out in the case of a 16-bit > > addressable EEPROM

Re: designware platdrv and runtime pm?

On 09.11.2015 23:15, Wolfram Sang wrote: Hi guys, while handling the merge conflict for the designware-platdrv, I noticed an asymmetry in the runtime PM handling. Currently, code looks like this: if (dev->pm_runtime_disabled) { pm_runtime_forbid(>dev); } else {

Re: [PATCH v4] at24: Support SMBus read/write of 16-bit devices

Hi Aaron, On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 18:25:11 -0600 (CST), Aaron Sierra wrote: > Previously, the at24 driver would bail out in the case of a 16-bit > addressable EEPROM attached to an SMBus controller. This is because > SMBus block reads and writes don't map to I2C multi-byte reads and > writes when the

Re: i2c slave support für i.mx6

Hi Michael, > Do I understand it right, I can set the Master in slave mode and the > new slave get his own i2c-adresse? Yes, you can have your own address then. Note that I recently gave a talk about the slave framework. You can find the slides here: http://elinux.org/ELCE_2015_Presentations

i2c slave support für i.mx6

I am currently working with a I.mx6 quad-core-processor on Linux 3.19. I would like to implement the "I2C slave support", by Wolfram Sang, In this processor. For this purpose, I would have some comprehension questions. Do I understand it right, I can set the Master in slave mode and the new