On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:27:44PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:43:24PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> > It's a bit ironic that you've chosen GPIO as an example there. The
>>
; Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire
Looks good!
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
32_to_cpu() this makes sense now. memcpying part of an int
will keep the lowest byte at the lowest address, so this should work
for little-endian.
Acked-by: Alexandre Courbot
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 03:22:25PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Support CPU BE mode by adding endianness conversion for memcpy interactions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko
>> ---
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 3 +++
>> 1 fi
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Octavian Purdila
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Octavian Purdila
>> wrote:
>> > Some GPIO chips (e.g. the DLN2 USB adapter) have blocking get/set
&g
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Octavian Purdila
wrote:
> Some GPIO chips (e.g. the DLN2 USB adapter) have blocking get/set
> operation but do not need a threaded irq handler.
Sorry if you already explained this (I have been a little bit late
with the GPIO reviews recently), but does this optim
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 8:46 AM, RR wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Muthu Mani wrote:
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Alexandre Courbot [mailto:gnu...@gmail.com]
>>>> Se
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Muthu Mani wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alexandre Courbot [mailto:gnu...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 3:34 PM
>> To: Muthu Mani
>> Cc: Samuel Ortiz; Lee Jones; Wolfram Sang; Linus Walleij; Gre
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Muthu Mani wrote:
> +
> +static int cy_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> + unsigned offset)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cy_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> +
the driver that requests a "reset-gpio"
property.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot
---
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
On 06/03/2014 09:22 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
The DT bindings for the pca954x document that the reset GPIO is
specified through the "reset-gpios" property. However, the driver
erroneously uses a property name of "reset-gpio".
The GPIO DT bindings documentation mentions that
"GPIO properties s
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:42:44PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>
>>> I believe you want gpio_get_value() to return either the driven or
>>> actual pin value where it can
12 matches
Mail list logo
