On 11/5/2012 3:25 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 07:53:45PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti wrote:
On Monday 05 November 2012 07:44 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
- dev->syscstate);
- }
not sure if this will work. What abo
Hi Luca,
On 2/8/2012 12:25 PM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 16:42 +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 12:59 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 12:56:52PM +0200, Luciano Coelho wrote:
Sinc
On 1/11/2012 4:22 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
Something that puzzle me on that point is most architecture does not use
plateform_device and thus does not have any pdata to hack some custom function
pointers here an there.
It means that there is probably
On 1/11/2012 2:29 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Shubhrajyoti wrote:
On Tuesday 10 January 2012 08:56 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
"Datta, Shubhrajyoti" writes:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Datta, Shubhrajyoti
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Shubhrajyoti wrote:
On 1/2/2012 10:04 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 03:56:37PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
>> Add initial device-tree support for twl familly chips.
>> The current version is missing the regulator entries due
>> to the lack of DT regulator bindings for the moment.
>> Only the simpl
Hi Shubhro,
On 12/13/2011 11:55 AM, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
Under some error conditions the i2c driver may do a reset.
Adding a reset field and support in the device-specific code to aid
error-recovery.
Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D
---
arch/arm/plat-omap/i2c.c |2 ++
include/linux/i2c-oma
Hi Vishwa,
I just have a couple of minors comments:
On 9/4/2010 10:48 AM, Sripathy, Vishwanath wrote:
In current i2c core driver, call to pm_runtime_set_active from
i2c_device_pm_resume
will unconditionally enable i2c module and increment child count of the parent.
Because of this, in CPU Idle
