On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 00:37:46 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Actually, now that I'm looking at things, I don't think there will be
> a conflict. Go ahead and take it via your tree so that I don't make
> Linus' life harder than it needs to be.
OK, I've added the patch to my quilt series for the time b
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:53:30AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> Sorry for the late answer.
>
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:02:45 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Grant Likely
> > wrote:
> > > Currently, if an i2c bus driver supports both static and dynami
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> Sorry for the late answer.
>
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:02:45 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Grant Likely
>> wrote:
>> > Currently, if an i2c bus driver supports both static and dynamic bus
>> > ids
Hi Grant,
Sorry for the late answer.
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:02:45 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Grant Likely
> wrote:
> > Currently, if an i2c bus driver supports both static and dynamic bus
> > ids, it needs to choose between calling i2c_add_numbered_adapter() a
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Grant Likely
wrote:
> Currently, if an i2c bus driver supports both static and dynamic bus
> ids, it needs to choose between calling i2c_add_numbered_adapter() and
> i2c_add_adapter(). This patch makes i2c_add_numbered_adapter()
> redirect to i2c_add_adapter() if
Currently, if an i2c bus driver supports both static and dynamic bus
ids, it needs to choose between calling i2c_add_numbered_adapter() and
i2c_add_adapter(). This patch makes i2c_add_numbered_adapter()
redirect to i2c_add_adapter() if the requested bus id is -1.
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely
---
