On 10/11/11 16:21, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On 10/11/11 12:49, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:50:14 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:07:43 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
Reimplemented at least 17 times discounting error mangling cases
where it could be used.
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:50:14 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:07:43 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
Reimplemented at least 17 times discounting error mangling cases
where it could be used.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron ji...@cam.ac.uk
---
On 10/11/11 12:49, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:50:14 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:07:43 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
Reimplemented at least 17 times discounting error mangling cases
where it could be used.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron ji...@cam.ac.uk
Reimplemented at least 17 times discounting error mangling cases
where it could be used.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron ji...@cam.ac.uk
---
Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol |8
include/linux/i2c.h | 17 +
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:07:43 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
Reimplemented at least 17 times discounting error mangling cases
where it could be used.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron ji...@cam.ac.uk
---
Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol |8
include/linux/i2c.h |
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 23:10:05 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:48:14 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
@@ -88,6 +89,23 @@ extern s32 i2c_smbus_read_word_data(const struct
i2c_client *client,
u8 command);
extern s32
Hi Jonathan,
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:48:14 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
Reimplemented at least 17 times discounting error mangling cases
where it could be used.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron ji...@cam.ac.uk
---
Hi All,
Quite a number of devices rather unhelpfully handle smbus
On 09/22/11 14:48, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
Reimplemented at least 17 times discounting error mangling cases
where it could be used.
Anyone care to comment?
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron ji...@cam.ac.uk
---
Hi All,
Quite a number of devices rather unhelpfully handle smbus read/write
Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:37:11 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On 09/22/11 14:48, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
Reimplemented at least 17 times discounting error mangling cases
where it could be used.
Anyone care to comment?
I will. I started reviewing your patch and pondering its
Reimplemented at least 17 times discounting error mangling cases
where it could be used.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron ji...@cam.ac.uk
---
Hi All,
Quite a number of devices rather unhelpfully handle smbus read/write word
commands but return the result byte swapped. Hence drivers swap it back
10 matches
Mail list logo