On 4/4/2013 7:37 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 4 April 2013 19:24, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> As of commit 5f9296ba "i2c: Add bus recovery infrastructure", there
>> is now a global function with the same name, which clashes with
>> the davinci specific one. The obvious solution is to rename the
>> fun
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 01:54:29PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> As of commit 5f9296ba "i2c: Add bus recovery infrastructure", there
> is now a global function with the same name, which clashes with
> the davinci specific one. The obvious solution is to rename the
> function with a davinci prefix.
On 4 April 2013 19:24, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> As of commit 5f9296ba "i2c: Add bus recovery infrastructure", there
> is now a global function with the same name, which clashes with
> the davinci specific one. The obvious solution is to rename the
> function with a davinci prefix.
>
> Signed-off-by:
As of commit 5f9296ba "i2c: Add bus recovery infrastructure", there
is now a global function with the same name, which clashes with
the davinci specific one. The obvious solution is to rename the
function with a davinci prefix.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: Viresh Kumar
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.ker
