Tomasz,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21.06.2014 01:53, Doug Anderson wrote:
Kevin,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
Kevin,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 2:48 PM,
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
[...]
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure noirq is going to work correctly, at least not with current
callbacks. I can see a call to clk_prepare_enable() there which needs to
acquire a mutex.
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
Kevin,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
Kevin,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Doug,
Doug Anderson
On 24.06.2014 00:19, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
[...]
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure noirq is going to work correctly, at least not with current
callbacks. I can see a call to
Kevin,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
[...]
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure noirq is going to work correctly, at least not with current
callbacks. I
On 24.06.2014 00:27, Doug Anderson wrote:
Kevin,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
[...]
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure noirq is going to work
Kevin,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
So I guess in this case the truly correct way to handle it is:
1. i2c controller should have Runtime PM even though (as per the code
now) there's nothing you can do to it to save power under normal
circumstances.
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
Kevin,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
So I guess in this case the truly correct way to handle it is:
1. i2c controller should have Runtime PM even though (as per the code
now) there's nothing you can do to
Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com writes:
On 24.06.2014 00:27, Doug Anderson wrote:
Kevin,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
[...]
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Doug,
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
The original code for the exynos i2c controller registered for the
noirq variants. However during review feedback it was
Kevin,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Doug,
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
The original code for the exynos i2c
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
Kevin,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Doug,
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org
Kevin,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
Kevin,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Doug,
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:43
On 21.06.2014 01:53, Doug Anderson wrote:
Kevin,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
Kevin,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Doug,
Doug Anderson
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
The original code for the exynos i2c controller registered for the
noirq variants. However during review feedback it was moved to
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS without anyone noticing that it meant we were no
longer actually noirq (despite functions named
Kevin,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org writes:
The original code for the exynos i2c controller registered for the
noirq variants. However during review feedback it was moved to
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS without anyone
The original code for the exynos i2c controller registered for the
noirq variants. However during review feedback it was moved to
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS without anyone noticing that it meant we were no
longer actually noirq (despite functions named
exynos5_i2c_suspend_noirq and
17 matches
Mail list logo
