Re: [PATCH] i2c: omap: fix spurious IRQs: disable/enable IRQ at INTC when idle

2012-11-01 Thread Kalle Jokiniemi
to, 2012-11-01 kello 23:49 +0100, Wolfram Sang kirjoitti: > Hi, > > > Anyway new patch coming soon :) > > Was there one? I have skimmed a number of threads discussing spurious > interrupts or interrupt floods but AFAICS all discussions ended up in > trying another approach later or fixing the is

Re: [PATCH] i2c: omap: fix spurious IRQs: disable/enable IRQ at INTC when idle

2012-11-01 Thread Wolfram Sang
Hi, > Anyway new patch coming soon :) Was there one? I have skimmed a number of threads discussing spurious interrupts or interrupt floods but AFAICS all discussions ended up in trying another approach later or fixing the issue somewhere else than I2C. Is this correct? Or is there a bugfix patch

Re: [PATCH] i2c: omap: fix spurious IRQs: disable/enable IRQ at INTC when idle

2012-10-16 Thread Kalle Jokiniemi
Hi, ma, 2012-10-15 kello 18:02 -0700, Tony Lindgren kirjoitti: > * Kevin Hilman [121015 10:32]: > > Kalle Jokiniemi writes: > > > > > > Does not work for me :( > > > > > > As I said, the issue occurs for me when I enter static suspend (echo mem > > >> /sys/power/autosleep or /sys/power/state). I

Re: [PATCH] i2c: omap: fix spurious IRQs: disable/enable IRQ at INTC when idle

2012-10-15 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Kevin Hilman [121015 10:32]: > Kalle Jokiniemi writes: > > > > Does not work for me :( > > > > As I said, the issue occurs for me when I enter static suspend (echo mem > >> /sys/power/autosleep or /sys/power/state). I don't think doing this > > just in runtime pm will fix my issue. Or do those

Re: [PATCH] i2c: omap: fix spurious IRQs: disable/enable IRQ at INTC when idle

2012-10-15 Thread Kevin Hilman
Kalle Jokiniemi writes: > Hi, > > la, 2012-10-13 kello 01:00 +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta kirjoitti: >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Kevin Hilman >> wrote: >> > From: Kevin Hilman >> > >> > Currently, runtime PM is used to keep the device enabled only during >> > active transfers and for a co

Re: [PATCH] i2c: omap: fix spurious IRQs: disable/enable IRQ at INTC when idle

2012-10-14 Thread Kalle Jokiniemi
Hi, la, 2012-10-13 kello 01:00 +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta kirjoitti: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Kevin Hilman > wrote: > > From: Kevin Hilman > > > > Currently, runtime PM is used to keep the device enabled only during > > active transfers and for a configurable runtime PM autosuspend tim

Re: [PATCH] i2c: omap: fix spurious IRQs: disable/enable IRQ at INTC when idle

2012-10-12 Thread Shubhrajyoti Datta
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > From: Kevin Hilman > > Currently, runtime PM is used to keep the device enabled only during > active transfers and for a configurable runtime PM autosuspend timout > after an xfer. > > In addition to idling the device, driver's ->runtime_sus

[PATCH] i2c: omap: fix spurious IRQs: disable/enable IRQ at INTC when idle

2012-10-12 Thread Kevin Hilman
From: Kevin Hilman Currently, runtime PM is used to keep the device enabled only during active transfers and for a configurable runtime PM autosuspend timout after an xfer. In addition to idling the device, driver's ->runtime_suspend() method currently disables device interrupts when idle. Howe