Re: [PATCH] i2c-i801: Don't depend on other kernel driver config options

2011-05-15 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi David, On Fri, 13 May 2011 11:23:06 +0100, Woodhouse, David wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 11:01 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Don't let other driver config options influence us, as it makes the > > code more complex and fragile for a small benefit. There's nothing > > wrong with instantiating

Re: [PATCH] i2c-i801: Don't depend on other kernel driver config options

2011-05-13 Thread Woodhouse, David
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 11:01 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > Don't let other driver config options influence us, as it makes the > code more complex and fragile for a small benefit. There's nothing > wrong with instantiating I2C devices even if they don't have a driver. > And we're talking about 835 ex

[PATCH] i2c-i801: Don't depend on other kernel driver config options

2011-05-13 Thread Jean Delvare
Don't let other driver config options influence us, as it makes the code more complex and fragile for a small benefit. There's nothing wrong with instantiating I2C devices even if they don't have a driver. And we're talking about 835 extra bytes in the binary on x86-64, that's hardly worth arguing