On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:11:26 +, jhautb...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Yes, that would be better. If you do that, please make sure to run your
>
> > patch through scripts/checkpatch.pl before sending it.
>
> I will take the time to do it. I can't say when :p.
> I did run checkpatch.pl, and I can't re
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:02:41 +, jhautb...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> < snip >
> > Did you test your patch? I am very skeptical that calling
>
> > single_release() out of the blue is the right thing to do. My instinct
>
> > tells me that single_release() is only meant for callers of
>
>
Hi Jean-Michel,
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:01:28 +0100, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Here is a little patch which aims to cleanup the release function in
> i2c-dev.c.
> This is only a call to single_release, instead of kfree and several things.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Michel Hautbois
Hi there,
Here is a little patch which aims to cleanup the release function in i2c-dev.c.
This is only a call to single_release, instead of kfree and several things.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Michel Hautbois
---
drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c
--- linux-2.6.34-rc2/drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c.orig 2010-03-23
10:19:26
