Re: [PATCH 0/5] mv64xxx updates

2014-03-10 Thread Wolfram Sang
I will test it tomorrow and let you know if it fixed the bug. I will also take time to review the RFC patches. I applied the other three patches now. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH 0/5] mv64xxx updates

2014-02-18 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi, On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:51:00PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: Dear Wolfram Sang, On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:36:28 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: So, this is a series I came up with trying to fix the issue found by Kevin. Patches 1+2 are hopefully fixing the bug (in theory, I don't have

[PATCH 0/5] mv64xxx updates

2014-02-13 Thread Wolfram Sang
So, this is a series I came up with trying to fix the issue found by Kevin. Patches 1+2 are hopefully fixing the bug (in theory, I don't have the HW). Patches 3-5 are RFC, and if patch 3 actually works (see the CHECKME), then 4+5 are further cleanup possibilities. And there is still more

Re: [PATCH 0/5] mv64xxx updates

2014-02-13 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Dear Wolfram Sang, On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:36:28 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: So, this is a series I came up with trying to fix the issue found by Kevin. Patches 1+2 are hopefully fixing the bug (in theory, I don't have the HW). Patches 3-5 are RFC, and if patch 3 actually works (see the