On 19 February 2014 16:10, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:20:07PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>
>> Also note that, Russell has already applied the corresponding part in
>> the amba bus (patch 1)
>
> Why would this depend on an AMBA patch and if it does surely the two
> need to be mer
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:20:07PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Also note that, Russell has already applied the corresponding part in
> the amba bus (patch 1)
Why would this depend on an AMBA patch and if it does surely the two
need to be merged together somehow?
signature.asc
Description: Digit
On 4 February 2014 16:58, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Convert to the SET_PM_RUNTIME_PM macro while defining the runtime PM
> callbacks. This means the callbacks becomes available for both
> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP and CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME, which is needed to handle the
> combinations of these scenarios.
>
> Cc: Mar
Convert to the SET_PM_RUNTIME_PM macro while defining the runtime PM
callbacks. This means the callbacks becomes available for both
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP and CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME, which is needed to handle the
combinations of these scenarios.
Cc: Mark Brown
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson
---
drivers/spi/spi
