On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:35:29PM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
+CC Guenter Roeck
[...]
However, the kernel-doc comment for init_machine in
mach_desc.h is now slightly confusing (still mentioning device tree).
A platform of future can still call of_platform_populate() etc to reparse the
+CC Guenter Roeck
On Tuesday 07 October 2014 03:00 PM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
Hi Vineet,
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 09:20:20AM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
Hi Chrisitian,
On Monday 22 September 2014 10:53 PM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
If there is no designware i2c in any of your platforms,
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Mika Westerberg
mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com wrote:
arch/arm/boot/dts/spear1310.dtsi
arch/arm/boot/dts/spear320.dtsi
arch/arm/boot/dts/spear3xx.dtsi
arch/arm/boot/dts/spear600.dtsi
I think we are good to go with the first three but not sure about the
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:12:07PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 11:36:34AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:26:07PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
From: Carl Peng carlpeng...@gmail.com
Add support for AMD version of the DW I2C host
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:24:50PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:12:07PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 11:36:34AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:26:07PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
From: Carl Peng
1) They do not apply cleanly on top of other i2c-designware changes I
applied (check i2c/for-next I just pushed out). The conflicts might not
be hard, but they were not trivial enough for me to do them inbetween
other things. I'd be very happy about a repost on top of i2c/for-next.
OK,
Hi Chrisitian,
On Monday 22 September 2014 10:53 PM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
If there is no designware i2c in any of your platforms, simply ignore
my message. From my point of view there is no need to move select
COMMON_CLK up to the ARC architecture level.
I still ended up moving COMMON_CLK
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 07:22:52PM +0200, Christian Ruppert wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 02:16:25PM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On Monday 22 September 2014 07:30 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
COMMON_CLK is not selected by the ARC architecture in general. However,
we do select COMMON_CLK
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 11:36:34AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:26:07PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
From: Carl Peng carlpeng...@gmail.com
Add support for AMD version of the DW I2C host controller. The device is
enumerated from ACPI namespace with ACPI ID
Dear Mika,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:12:07PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 11:36:34AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:26:07PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
From: Carl Peng carlpeng...@gmail.com
Add support for AMD version of the DW I2C
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 01:48:57PM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On Monday 22 September 2014 05:59 PM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
Dear Mika,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:12:07PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 11:36:34AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at
On Monday 22 September 2014 07:30 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
COMMON_CLK is not selected by the ARC architecture in general. However,
we do select COMMON_CLK in the TB10x platform which uses the designware
I2C driver so this new dependency is no problem for us.
Vineet,
Do you see
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 02:16:25PM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On Monday 22 September 2014 07:30 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
COMMON_CLK is not selected by the ARC architecture in general. However,
we do select COMMON_CLK in the TB10x platform which uses the
designware
I2C driver so
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 02:16:25PM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On Monday 22 September 2014 07:30 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
COMMON_CLK is not selected by the ARC architecture in general. However,
we do select COMMON_CLK in the TB10x platform which uses the
designware
I2C driver so
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:26:07PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
From: Carl Peng carlpeng...@gmail.com
Add support for AMD version of the DW I2C host controller. The device is
enumerated from ACPI namespace with ACPI ID AMD0010. Because the core
driver needs an input source clock, and this
From: Carl Peng carlpeng...@gmail.com
Add support for AMD version of the DW I2C host controller. The device is
enumerated from ACPI namespace with ACPI ID AMD0010. Because the core
driver needs an input source clock, and this is not an Intel LPSS device
where clocks are provided through
16 matches
Mail list logo
