On 01/17/2014 05:57 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:37:56AM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
Sidenote: actually this modalias/module loading issue is different
and not related to stable ACPI i2c/spi slave device names.
Oh, I'd been under the impression that it was the rewrite that
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:37:56AM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
On 01/16/2014 09:46 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
This is needed for ACPI because we rewrite the device names to give us
stable names. With OF for I2C and SPI nothing bus specific is done that
affects this stuff so the default behaviour
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 17:08 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:46:37PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
index 3a94b79..2f4aea2 100644
--- a/drivers/base/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
@@ -677,7 +677,13
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
index d74c0b3..c4c5588 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
@@ -104,6 +104,11 @@ static int i2c_device_match(struct device *dev, struct
device_driver *drv)
static int i2c_device_uevent(struct device
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:46:37PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
ACPI enumerated devices has ACPI style _HID and _CID strings,
all of these strings can be used for both driver loading and matching.
Currently, in Platform, I2C and SPI bus, the ACPI style driver matching
is supported by invoking
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 12:28 +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:46:37PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
ACPI enumerated devices has ACPI style _HID and _CID strings,
all of these strings can be used for both driver loading and matching.
Currently, in Platform, I2C and SPI bus,
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:27 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
index d74c0b3..c4c5588 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
@@ -104,6 +104,11 @@ static int i2c_device_match(struct device *dev, struct
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:28:19PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:46:37PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
ACPI enumerated devices has ACPI style _HID and _CID strings,
all of these strings can be used for both driver loading and matching.
Currently, in Platform, I2C and SPI
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:05:09PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:27 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
I wonder why we don't have/need that with CONFIG_OF? Because probably
nobody is using modules with i2c devices there?
This seems a gap to me but I'm not 100% sure.
I saw Grant
On Thursday, January 16, 2014 04:04:35 PM Zhang Rui wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 17:08 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:46:37PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
index 3a94b79..2f4aea2 100644
---
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 02:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, January 16, 2014 04:04:35 PM Zhang Rui wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 17:08 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:46:37PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c
On 01/16/2014 09:46 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:05:09PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:27 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
This seems a gap to me but I'm not 100% sure.
I saw Grant Likely introduced the OF style MODALIAS to platform bus, and
OF style
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:46:37PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
index 3a94b79..2f4aea2 100644
--- a/drivers/base/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
@@ -677,7 +677,13 @@ static ssize_t modalias_show(struct device *dev, struct
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 17:35 +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:48:31PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
ACPI enumerated devices has ACPI style _HID and _CID strings,
all of these strings can be used for both driver loading and matching.
But currently, in Platform, I2C and SPI bus,
ACPI enumerated devices has ACPI style _HID and _CID strings,
all of these strings can be used for both driver loading and matching.
Currently, in Platform, I2C and SPI bus, the ACPI style driver matching
is supported by invoking acpi_driver_match_device() in bus .match() callback.
But, the
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:00:17PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 17:35 +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:48:31PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
ACPI enumerated devices has ACPI style _HID and _CID strings,
all of these strings can be used for both driver loading
ACPI enumerated devices has ACPI style _HID and _CID strings,
all of these strings can be used for both driver loading and matching.
But currently, in Platform, I2C and SPI bus, only the ACPI style
driver matching is supported by invoking acpi_driver_match_device()
in bus .match() callback.
This
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:48:31PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
ACPI enumerated devices has ACPI style _HID and _CID strings,
all of these strings can be used for both driver loading and matching.
But currently, in Platform, I2C and SPI bus, only the ACPI style
driver matching is supported by
18 matches
Mail list logo
