Hi,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 03:04:29PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> [...]
> >> + * Don't write to this register if the IE state is 0 as it can
> >> + * cause deadlock.
> >> + */
> >> + if (dev->iestate)
> >> +
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
[...]
>> + * Don't write to this register if the IE state is 0 as it can
>> + * cause deadlock.
>> + */
>> + if (dev->iestate)
>> + omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_IE_REG, dev->iestate);
>> +}
>> +
>> static in
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:23:56PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:
> >> @@ -1268,23 +1276,8 @@ static int omap_i2c_runtime_resume(struct device
> >> *dev)
> >> {
> >> struct omap_i2c_dev *_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >>
> >> - if (_dev->flags & OMAP_I2C_FLAG_RESET_REGS_POSTIDLE)
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:06:51PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
>> re-factor omap_i2c_init() so that we can re-use it for resume.
>> While at it also remove the bufstate variable as we write it
>> in omap_i2c_resize_fifo for every tra
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:06:51PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
> re-factor omap_i2c_init() so that we can re-use it for resume.
> While at it also remove the bufstate variable as we write it
> in omap_i2c_resize_fifo for every transfer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D
> ---
> v2 - add the
re-factor omap_i2c_init() so that we can re-use it for resume.
While at it also remove the bufstate variable as we write it
in omap_i2c_resize_fifo for every transfer.
Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D
---
v2 - add the iestate 0 check back.
- Remove a stray change.
- Applies on top of Felipe's pat
