On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:24:47PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:12:43PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > I think it would make more sense for you to merge that one together with
> > the related i2c changes. If you prefer that I take it through MFD,
> > please let me know
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:12:43PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Mika,
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:32:37PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > The I2C core now prepares runtime PM on behalf of the I2C client device, so
> > only thing the driver needs to do is to call pm_runtime_put() at the end
Hi Mika,
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:32:37PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> The I2C core now prepares runtime PM on behalf of the I2C client device, so
> only thing the driver needs to do is to call pm_runtime_put() at the end of
> its ->probe().
>
> This patch converts wm8994 driver to use this
The I2C core now prepares runtime PM on behalf of the I2C client device, so
only thing the driver needs to do is to call pm_runtime_put() at the end of
its ->probe().
This patch converts wm8994 driver to use this model.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg
---
drivers/mfd/wm8994-core.c | 5 ++---
1 f