> to print any error messages, but I was not sure. Anyway, I think I'll drop
> the error
> message entirely and leave error handling to the calling code.
Even better :)
Thanks,
Wolfram
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
eerwald
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] i2c: core: Add support for best effort block read
> emulation
>
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 05:04:09PM +0300, Irina Tirdea wrote:
> > There are devices that need to handle block transactions
> > regardless of the capabilities exported by t
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 05:04:09PM +0300, Irina Tirdea wrote:
> There are devices that need to handle block transactions
> regardless of the capabilities exported by the adapter.
> For performance reasons, they need to use i2c read blocks
> if available, otherwise emulate the block transaction with
On 04/08/15 15:04, Irina Tirdea wrote:
> There are devices that need to handle block transactions
> regardless of the capabilities exported by the adapter.
> For performance reasons, they need to use i2c read blocks
> if available, otherwise emulate the block transaction with word
> or byte transac
There are devices that need to handle block transactions
regardless of the capabilities exported by the adapter.
For performance reasons, they need to use i2c read blocks
if available, otherwise emulate the block transaction with word
or byte transactions.
Add support for a helper function that wo
