[PATCHv4 2/3] i2c: Use stable dev_name for ACPI enumerated I2C slaves

2013-11-14 Thread Jarkko Nikula
Current I2C adapter id - client address x-00yy based device naming scheme is not always stable enough to be used in name based matching, for instance within ALSA SoC subsystem. This is problematic in PC kind of platforms where I2C adapter numbers can change due variable amount of bus controllers,

Re: [PATCHv4 2/3] i2c: Use stable dev_name for ACPI enumerated I2C slaves

2013-11-14 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 02:03:52PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote: Current I2C adapter id - client address x-00yy based device naming scheme is not always stable enough to be used in name based matching, for instance within ALSA SoC subsystem. This is problematic in PC kind of platforms where