> suspend/resume order depends on probe ordering, so with deferred probe,
> the probe ordering might be right, but it should be thoroughly tested.
Thanks a lot for the input here, Kevin!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Ezequiel Garcia writes:
> On 10/20/2014 06:07 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Ezequiel Garcia writes:
>>
>>> The _noirq were previously chosen to make sure all the users of the
>>> adapter were suspended by the time the adapter itself enters the
>>> suspended state.
>>>
>>> The {suspend,resume}_noir
On 10/20/2014 06:07 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Ezequiel Garcia writes:
>
>> The _noirq were previously chosen to make sure all the users of the
>> adapter were suspended by the time the adapter itself enters the
>> suspended state.
>>
>> The {suspend,resume}_noirq usage was converted from an earl
Ezequiel Garcia writes:
> The _noirq were previously chosen to make sure all the users of the
> adapter were suspended by the time the adapter itself enters the
> suspended state.
>
> The {suspend,resume}_noirq usage was converted from an earlier
> implementation based on suspend_late and resume_
The _noirq were previously chosen to make sure all the users of the
adapter were suspended by the time the adapter itself enters the
suspended state.
The {suspend,resume}_noirq usage was converted from an earlier
implementation based on suspend_late and resume_early on this commit:
commit 57f4d4f
