On 09/24/2013 03:33 AM, Marc Dietrich wrote:
...
> What I learned from the somehow unfortune discussion yesterday on IRC is that
> we cannot describe the exact i2c topology in the device tree, especially if
> it
> is software configuable (slave/master changing roles).
Well, there's also no need
On 09/24/2013 01:19 AM, Andrey Danin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Stephen Warren I think you'd just have the following
>
> /* master */
> i2c@x {
> foo@0x40 {
> reg = ;
> compatible = "nvidia,nvec";
> }
> };
>
> i2c@yyy
Am Dienstag, 24. September 2013, 11:39:21 schrieb Andrey Danin:
> On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 10:36 -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 09/23/2013 08:52 AM, Marc Dietrich wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, 17. September 2013, 15:48:12 schrieb Stephen Warren:
> > >> On 09/17/2013 01:53 AM, Marc Dietrich wrote:
> >
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 10:36 -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/23/2013 08:52 AM, Marc Dietrich wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 17. September 2013, 15:48:12 schrieb Stephen Warren:
> >> On 09/17/2013 01:53 AM, Marc Dietrich wrote:
> >>> Hi Stephen,
> >>>
> >>> Am Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2013, 15:03:14 schrieb
On 09/23/2013 08:52 AM, Marc Dietrich wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 17. September 2013, 15:48:12 schrieb Stephen Warren:
>> On 09/17/2013 01:53 AM, Marc Dietrich wrote:
>>> Hi Stephen,
>>>
>>> Am Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2013, 15:03:14 schrieb Stephen Warren:
The generic I2C bindings already define that the
Am Dienstag, 17. September 2013, 15:48:12 schrieb Stephen Warren:
> On 09/17/2013 01:53 AM, Marc Dietrich wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2013, 15:03:14 schrieb Stephen Warren:
> >> The generic I2C bindings already define that the other chips on the I2C
> >> bus appear directl
> It looks like that the i2c subsystem needs some modifications to allow to
> specify a master device which is attached to a slave controller. Maybe
> someone
> from the i2c folks (cc'ed) can comment on this?
The linux i2c core does not really support controllers being a slave.
There are proba
On 09/17/2013 01:53 AM, Marc Dietrich wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2013, 15:03:14 schrieb Stephen Warren:
>> The generic I2C bindings already define that the other chips on the I2C
>> bus appear directly underneath the I2C controller's DT node. Perhaps it
>> isn't a big issue to
Hi Stephen,
Am Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2013, 15:03:14 schrieb Stephen Warren:
> The generic I2C bindings already define that the other chips on the I2C
> bus appear directly underneath the I2C controller's DT node. Perhaps it
> isn't a big issue to change that, since each I2C controller can define
> th
