Salut Jean-François, hi Guenter,
Sorry for jumping in a little late, I am just back from vacation.
On Thu, 9 May 2013 08:38:28 -0400, Jean-François Dagenais wrote:
On 2013-05-08, at 11:53 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Is one of the I2C adapter drivers your own ? If so, you can disable
Salut Jean, merci de participer!
On 2013-05-13, at 4:11 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
Guenter is right. You never have to disable auto-detection in the slave
drivers (jc42 etc.) All these slave drivers do is claim I _can_ do
auto-detection, not I _will_ do auto-detection. It's always up to the
On Mon, 13 May 2013 09:54:47 -0400, Jean-François Dagenais wrote:
Salut Jean, merci de participer!
On 2013-05-13, at 4:11 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
Guenter is right. You never have to disable auto-detection in the slave
drivers (jc42 etc.) All these slave drivers do is claim I _can_ do
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 04:14:13PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Mon, 13 May 2013 09:54:47 -0400, Jean-François Dagenais wrote:
Salut Jean, merci de participer!
On 2013-05-13, at 4:11 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
Guenter is right. You never have to disable auto-detection in the slave
On 2013-05-08, at 11:53 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Guess the real conclusion is that one should avoid two active masters
in the first place if possible.
I agree, I can't think of any benefits worth the trouble.
Is one of the I2C adapter drivers your own ? If so, you can disable
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:38:28AM -0400, Jean-François Dagenais wrote:
On 2013-05-08, at 11:53 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Guess the real conclusion is that one should avoid two active masters
in the first place if possible.
I agree, I can't think of any benefits worth the trouble.
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 11:57:59AM -0400, Jean-François Dagenais wrote:
Hi all,
I've read the discussion on multimaster and I have to agree with Uwe about
masters doing the arbitration (and retry). However, there's another issue
which one quickly discovers when adding a second master on a
On 2013-05-08, at 13:54, Guenter Roeck wrote:
[...]
Isn't it the point of having multiple masters on the same bus, that each of
them can manage the same devices ?
I wouldn't think so. You mention why in your last paragraph and I totally see
and agree with that. So that is not my intention at
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 09:50:44PM -0400, Jean-François Dagenais wrote:
On 2013-05-08, at 13:54, Guenter Roeck wrote:
[...]
Isn't it the point of having multiple masters on the same bus, that each of
them can manage the same devices ?
I wouldn't think so. You mention why in your last
