On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:36:22AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> IPMI is still likely to access the SMBus controller. If there's a BMC
> in the machine, it can also access the SMBus slave with its own
> controller. It would be good to rule this out by disabling IPMI
> completely, removing the BMC fr
On Fri, 17 May 2013 20:27:06 +1000, Robert Norris wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:49:28AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Hmm, can you please dump the PCI configuration space of the SMBus
> > controller?
> >
> > # /sbin/lspci -s 00:1f.3 -xxx
>
> 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:49:28AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hmm, can you please dump the PCI configuration space of the SMBus
> controller?
>
> # /sbin/lspci -s 00:1f.3 -xxx
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB/3100 Chipset SMBus Controller
(rev 09)
00: 86 80 9b 26 41 05 80 02 09
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 05:54:33PM +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> Was Robert able to get the system working without hangs by disabling
> the IRQ feature of i2c-i801 module when it was builtin?
Yes. There are no hangs when interrupts are explicitly disabled with
disable_features=0x10 or when 6676a847
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:36:22AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> IPMI is still likely to access the SMBus controller. If there's a BMC
> in the machine, it can also access the SMBus slave with its own
> controller. It would be good to rule this out by disabling IPMI
> completely, removing the BMC fr
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 13:44:55 +1000, Robert Norris wrote:
>> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:49:23PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
>> > > Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 0
>> >
>> > Hmm, this "IRQ 0" is quite odd. I'm wondering if thi
On Fri, 17 May 2013 11:22:17 +0200, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
> Hi,
> while you are chasing some problem with i2c_801 I would like to mention
> that I never got an answer on the thread https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/23/405
> about a kmemleak reported by kernel . Maybe this could give you a hint?
> If t
Hi,
while you are chasing some problem with i2c_801 I would like to mention
that I never got an answer on the thread https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/23/405
about a kmemleak reported by kernel . Maybe this could give you a hint?
If these do not overlap I would be anyways glad to receive an answer via
On Thu, 16 May 2013 13:44:55 +1000, Robert Norris wrote:
> > Then do a simple read from a random address
> > with:
> > # i2cget 4 0x50 0x00
> > (Adjust the bus number as needed.)
> > I am curious if this will hang as well or only when accessing the
> > clock chip at address 0x69.
>
> Yep
Hi Robert,
On Thu, 16 May 2013 13:44:55 +1000, Robert Norris wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:49:23PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 0
> >
> > Hmm, this "IRQ 0" is quite odd. I'm wondering if this could be the
> > reason for this hang. Was it with the i2c-i
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:49:23PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 0
>
> Hmm, this "IRQ 0" is quite odd. I'm wondering if this could be the
> reason for this hang. Was it with the i2c-i801 driver loaded, or
> blacklisted? Please check if it makes a difference.
Th
Robert,
On Wed, 15 May 2013 21:27:41 +1000, Robert Norris wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:20:44AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Can you share the full output of lspci -s 00:1f.3 -vv?
>
> 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB/3100 Chipset SMBus
> Controller (rev 09)
> Subsyste
Hi Jean,
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:20:44AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Thanks a lot for reporting and even more for bisecting it, I know it
> takes time. I apologize for the trouble. I suppose I should have been
> a bit more cautious with the 63xxESB chips as they are a different
> family of har
Hi Robert,
Adding the linux-i2c list to Cc.
On Wed, 15 May 2013 09:16:26 +1000, Robert Norris wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:22:32AM +1000, Robert Norris wrote:
> > We have a number of Intel x3550 servers (Intel 5000-series). They've
> > been running 3.7.2 fine.
> >
> > In the last week I'v
14 matches
Mail list logo
