Re: [PATCH 03/17] mmc: mmci: Mask IRQs for all variants during runtime suspend

2014-02-24 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Ulf Hansson ulf.hans...@linaro.org wrote: On 18 February 2014 17:05, Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote: On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 04:58:44PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: In runtime suspended state, we are not expecting IRQs and thus we can

Re: [PATCH 03/17] mmc: mmci: Mask IRQs for all variants during runtime suspend

2014-02-18 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 18 February 2014 17:05, Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote: On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 04:58:44PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: In runtime suspended state, we are not expecting IRQs and thus we can safely mask them, not only for pwrreg_nopower variants but for all. Obviously we

Re: [PATCH 03/17] mmc: mmci: Mask IRQs for all variants during runtime suspend

2014-02-18 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 05:36:52PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: If we add SDIO irq support to mmci in future; parts of that implementation includes a re-route of DAT1 to a GPIO irq when entering runtime suspend state. The mmci HW will in runtime suspend state, not be responsible for handling