On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 11:24:34AM -0800, Daniel McNeil wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 18:41, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Did we fix this yet?
> >
>
> Here's a patch against 2.6.11 that fixes the problem.
> It changes is_hugepage_only_range() to take mm as an argument
> and then changes the places t
> if (cpuid == me) {
>- printk("%s: trying to call self\n", __FUNCTION__);
>+ printk(KERN_INFO "%s: trying to call self\n", __FUNCTION__);
> put_cpu();
> return -EBUSY;
> }
I think this is a bit higher priority than KERN_INFO. If w
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 18:41, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Did we fix this yet?
>
Daniel McNeil wrote on Tuesday, March 22, 2005 11:25 AM
> Here's a patch against 2.6.11 that fixes the problem.
> It changes is_hugepage_only_range() to take mm as an argument
> and then changes the places that call it to p
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 18:41, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Did we fix this yet?
>
Here's a patch against 2.6.11 that fixes the problem.
It changes is_hugepage_only_range() to take mm as an argument
and then changes the places that call it to pass 'mm'.
It includes a change for ia64 which has not been co
Remove the p_nodepda and p_subnodepda pointers from the pda_s structure.
And then define a new per-cpu pointer to the nodepda and export it so
that it can be accessed by kernel modules.
Signed-off-by: Dean Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-ia64/sn/nodepda.h
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 08:42:58PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Dean Nelson wrote:
> >
> > > Another step in the effort to eliminate the SN pda structure.
> > > This patch moves the cnodeid_to_nasid_table field out of the pda,
> > > making it a standalone per-cpu data it
