> Is anyone ia64-savy interested in revising the patch posted by David in
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=111575781225495&w=2 ?
>
> This would allow for converting ia64 to the generic ptrace code,
> something I would love to see.
Aren't we heading towards "utrace" as a ptrace replacement?
-T
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:17:28 -0700
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:59:17 GMT
> Linux Kernel Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > + BUG_ON(bind_irq_vector(irq, vector));
>
> It's not good practice to do assert(expression-with-side-effects). Because
>
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:59:17 GMT
Linux Kernel Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + BUG_ON(bind_irq_vector(irq, vector));
It's not good practice to do assert(expression-with-side-effects). Because
if someone wants to create a build which has all the assertions disabled,
the resulting b
Is anyone ia64-savy interested in revising the patch posted by David in
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=111575781225495&w=2 ?
This would allow for converting ia64 to the generic ptrace code,
something I would love to see.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" i
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Luck, Tony wrote:
>
> This will update the files shown below. I'm touching a few
> non-ia64 files (they are at the bottom of the diffstat) in here
> to delete the CONFIG_TIME_INTERPOLATION code that nobody except
> ia64 used.
Thanks. That timekeeping duplication was confus
Hi Linus,
please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/aegl/linux-2.6.git release
This will update the files shown below. I'm touching a few
non-ia64 files (they are at the bottom of the diffstat) in here
to delete the CONFIG_TIME_INTERPOLATION code that nobody except
luck wrote: [Fri Jul 20 2007, 12:33:43PM EDT]
> > I need to make the cleanups Tony identified. After that how would you like
> > to
> > proceed? Combining your patch 1/3 and my 1/2 seems logical.
>
> I've done the cleanup, and merged Seto-san's parts 1,2,3 with your part 1, and
> updated it a
> I need to make the cleanups Tony identified. After that how would you like to
> proceed? Combining your patch 1/3 and my 1/2 seems logical.
I've done the cleanup, and merged Seto-san's parts 1,2,3 with your part 1, and
updated it all for the tip of Linus' tree. Result is below.
Part 2 stayed t
Hi,
Sorry for the delay in response.
Hidetoshi Seto wrote: [Wed Jul 18 2007, 10:58:55AM EDT]
> Hi all,
>
> This is a set of patch for ia64 clocksource to improve performance
> of fsys_gettimeofday (and also normal gettimeofday).
>
> [1/3] copy time structures into fsys_gtod_data
> [2/3] sepa
