RE: [PATCH] Fix processor_get_freq

2007-08-14 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Ack. Thanks, Venki >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Williamson >Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 2:50 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: linux-ia64 >Subject: [PATCH] Fix processor_get_freq > > > The core cpufreq code doesn't appear

Re: BINIT and physical address

2007-08-14 Thread Bernhard Walle
* Luck, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-14 23:10]: > But there isn't a user-mode accessible way to convert them to > physical addresses. Well, there is a way (indirectly). Because there's /dev/mem, any userspace program can expose the page tables of the kernel. If you have debugging informatio

RE: BINIT and physical address

2007-08-14 Thread Luck, Tony
> Some help is needed with debugging of a hang. > A system hits BINIT once in a while and the processors are all > spinning on the address 0x0012C00 and if the HT is off the address > becomes 0x002A80. This is a physical address captured on the bus > by analyser. How can this address be dec

Re: [PATCH]utrace: IA64 RSE bug

2007-08-14 Thread Roland McGrath
> > If the gist of your patch here seems right to ia64 folks, then I'd > > suggest you do a patch adding ia64_sync_krbs to the upstream kernel. > > That would be the necessary prelude to doing the arch_ptrace_stop plan, > > which I can help ia64 folks with later. > Ok, this is the patch against 2.6