RE: [PATCH] Register memory ranges in a consistent manner on IA64

2007-10-09 Thread Luck, Tony
> Perhaps we should change the calling convention for call_pernode_memory() > (It currently takes [start,len] as physical addresses rather than [start,end] > as virtual addresses) so it can be used as a first argument to > efi_memmap_walk() ... so the code can be: > > efi_memmap_walk(call_per

RE: [PATCH] ia64: /proc/cpuinfo "physical id" field cleanups

2007-10-09 Thread Luck, Tony
> You should have seen this printk: > > printk(KERN_ERR "ia64_sal_pltid failed with %ld\n", status); > > Can you verify that you saw that in your dmesg? I think the > status should be -1, due to not-implemented. Yes. I see this message, and the status is indeed -1. -Tony - To unsubscribe f

Re: [PATCH] ia64: /proc/cpuinfo "physical id" field cleanups

2007-10-09 Thread Alex Chiang
Hi Tony, Thanks for looking at this. > > - expose "physical id" field, even on CPUs that are not > > multi-core / multi-threaded. Now we know what sockets > > Madisons live in too. > > This sounds like a good idea. But this patch didn't work for me > to achieve that on my HP 262