RE: [PATCH] ptrace RSE bug

2007-10-24 Thread Luck, Tony
Thanks. So Tony, how do think about the IA64 part of the patch? Having to use ia64_peek() and ia64_poke() to copy the RBS 8 bytes at a time looks a bit ugly ... but this isn't in the performance path (unless you are running your whole application under strace(1)!) so it probably isn't an issue.

RE: [PATCH] ptrace RSE bug

2007-10-24 Thread Shaohua Li
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 07:38 +0800, Luck, Tony wrote: Thanks. So Tony, how do think about the IA64 part of the patch? Having to use ia64_peek() and ia64_poke() to copy the RBS 8 bytes at a time looks a bit ugly ... but this isn't in the performance path (unless you are running your whole