On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:40:29AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 08:30 -0800, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > Thanks for the review Simon. Is the patch below more like what
> > > you're thinking? I agree that check_bugs doesn't initial seem like the
> > > most appropriate pla
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 08:14:19AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 16:15 +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:31:07AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > >
> > >I'd like to move our call to dmi_scan_machine up earlier in the boot
> > > process so tha
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 08:30 -0800, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > Thanks for the review Simon. Is the patch below more like what
> > you're thinking? I agree that check_bugs doesn't initial seem like the
> > most appropriate place to setup DMI, but think about what DMI is
> > typically used for in the
> Thanks for the review Simon. Is the patch below more like what
> you're thinking? I agree that check_bugs doesn't initial seem like the
> most appropriate place to setup DMI, but think about what DMI is
> typically used for in the kernel.
Then re-name check_bugs() to something more suited to
> Currently, XPC's heartbeat timer function runs on whatever CPU modprobe/insmod
> ran on when XPC was started. To avoid the heartbeat from being delayed for
> long periods the timer function must run on CPU 0.
Does Altix allow hot remove of cpu0? If so, then you have a problem.
-Tony
-
To unsub
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 16:15 +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:31:07AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >
> >I'd like to move our call to dmi_scan_machine up earlier in the boot
> > process so that we can take advantage of a DMI hook, called out of
> > acpi_early_init, to
Currently, XPC's heartbeat timer function runs on whatever CPU modprobe/insmod
ran on when XPC was started. To avoid the heartbeat from being delayed for
long periods the timer function must run on CPU 0.
Signed-off-by: Dean Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/xpc_mai
I did run the kernel some more today and noticed some odd "hangs".
Some processes seemed to get stuck for many seconds and then
continued again. Didn't have time to try and track what was
happening. Have you seem snything like this?
I've encountered the similar phenomenon several times. I hav
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 02:55:24PM +0800, Luming Yu wrote:
> NAK for now.
>
> I'm trying to add lockdep , so please don't delete it until it could
> be proved really useless...
> Please don't hurry...
Ok, in that case I Re-ack your typo fix patch.
Sorry for the noise.
--
Horms
H: http://www.v
