> "Alexei" == Alexei Gerasimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexei> I have faced a problem of getting an operating system for
Alexei> it. Namely, Linux. I have tried installing both Debian 3.0r6
Alexei> Woody and Debian 4.0r1 Etch, however, the CD kernel doesn't
Alexei> succeed to boot. Somewh
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Luck, Tony wrote:
>
> Should I update my script that makes the "Please pull" message.
It should be added automatically to the diffstat if you create the
diffstat with
git diff -C --stat --summary linus...release
(that triple dot creates the diff from the last com
On Monday 10 December 2007 03:03:42 pm Alexei Gerasimov wrote:
> Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > I've only used the HP i2000 version, and even that's been a long time,
> > but my guess is that the firmware upgrade would be safe, and that the
> > appropriate HP-UX version would probably run on it.
> >
>
> Hmm. It also did:
>
> mode change 100755 => 100644 arch/ia64/scripts/unwcheck.py
Should I update my script that makes the "Please pull" message.
Right now it just uses "git whatchanged release ^linus | git-shortlog"
which doesn't mention any mode changes ... thus your understandable
confusion
> makes the Makefile work even for a non-executable file for when you use
> inferior tools, but does that mean that we should have thrown away the
> information that it *is* an executable file when not using those inferior
> tools?
Once I added the "python " in front of the name in the Makefi
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Luck, Tony wrote:
>
> This will update the files shown below.
>
> ..
> 16 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
Hmm. It also did:
mode change 100755 => 100644 arch/ia64/scripts/unwcheck.py
was that really intentional?
Sure, the commit itself:
> Andrew Mort
Hi Linus,
please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/aegl/linux-2.6.git release
This will update the files shown below.
Thanks!
-Tony
arch/ia64/Makefile |2 +-
arch/ia64/hp/sim/boot/Makefile |2 +-
arch/ia64/hp/sim/boot/bootloader.
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I've only used the HP i2000 version, and even that's been a long time,
> but my guess is that the firmware upgrade would be safe, and that the
> appropriate HP-UX version would probably run on it.
>
I've discovered a small detail about updates: the firmware update seems
to
On Sunday 09 December 2007 10:59:15 am Alexei Gerasimov wrote:
> I happen to posses an old "Big Sur" machine manufactured by Intel, based
> around two Itanium (Merced) CPU's and a 460GX chipset. The machine is
> labeled as an "enginnering sample" (label:
> http://ishells.net/spy/itanium/DSC00873.jp
> I happen to posses an old "Big Sur" machine manufactured by Intel, based
> around two Itanium (Merced) CPU's and a 460GX chipset. The machine is
> labeled as an "enginnering sample" (label:
> http://ishells.net/spy/itanium/DSC00873.jpg), and looks identical to the
> HP i2000 workstation (picture:
10 matches
Mail list logo
