Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)

2007-07-31 Thread Jes Sorensen
Doug Chapman wrote: FYI, booting for me just fine on a RHEL5 installed base. What distro were you booting on? Ok, I figured out which patch caused it, now to figure out whats wrong and how to fix it :( Jes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/kernel/linus/lguest/linux-2.6-lguest> git bisect bad0aa366f3

Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)

2007-07-30 Thread Jes Sorensen
Doug Chapman wrote: Jes, FYI, booting for me just fine on a RHEL5 installed base. What distro were you booting on? - Doug Hi Doug, SLES10 and Fedora Core 7 - similar behavior. I wonder if something sn2 specific might get overwritten. Haven't narrowed it down yet. Cheers, Jes - To unsubs

Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)

2007-07-30 Thread Doug Chapman
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 05:56 -0400, Jes Sorensen wrote: > > "Doug" == Doug Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Doug> Kenji, > > Doug> Yes, this does fix the problem. My system is booting just fine > Doug> with this patch. > > Doug, > > Just back from vacation - with this patch I don't s

Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)

2007-07-30 Thread Jes Sorensen
> "Doug" == Doug Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Doug> Kenji, Doug> Yes, this does fix the problem. My system is booting just fine Doug> with this patch. Doug, Just back from vacation - with this patch I don't see the crash either. I do however still see the hang in the boot scripts -

Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)

2007-07-25 Thread Horms
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 11:26:42AM -0400, Doug Chapman wrote: > On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 22:37 +0900, Horms wrote: > > > I was also seeing a strange problem relating to the > > vector domain patch which seemed to be causing > > corruption of vectors_in_migration, which caused migrate_irqs() > > to em

Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)

2007-07-25 Thread Horms
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 11:26:42AM -0400, Doug Chapman wrote: > On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 22:37 +0900, Horms wrote: > > > I was also seeing a strange problem relating to the > > vector domain patch which seemed to be causing > > corruption of vectors_in_migration, which caused migrate_irqs() > > to em

Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)

2007-07-25 Thread Doug Chapman
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 22:37 +0900, Horms wrote: > I was also seeing a strange problem relating to the > vector domain patch which seemed to be causing > corruption of vectors_in_migration, which caused migrate_irqs() > to emmit suprious IRQ errors (when called by kexec). > > I'll try and confirm

Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)

2007-07-25 Thread Horms
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 05:59:22PM +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote: > Doug, > > 2007-07-25 (水) の 01:09 -0400 に Doug Chapman さんは書きました: > > Yasuaki, > > > > I added a bunch of printk's to try to better understand this. > > ia64_mv.setup does get initialized properly but then gets overwritten. > > It a

Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)

2007-07-25 Thread Doug Chapman
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 17:59 +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote: > Doug, > > 2007-07-25 (水) の 01:09 -0400 に Doug Chapman さんは書きました: > > Yasuaki, > > > > I added a bunch of printk's to try to better understand this. > > ia64_mv.setup does get initialized properly but then gets overwritten. > > It appears

Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)

2007-07-25 Thread Kenji Kaneshige
Doug, 2007-07-25 (水) の 01:09 -0400 に Doug Chapman さんは書きました: > Yasuaki, > > I added a bunch of printk's to try to better understand this. > ia64_mv.setup does get initialized properly but then gets overwritten. > It appears that it gets overwritten in __bind_irq_vector but I have not > narrowed do

Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)

2007-07-24 Thread Doug Chapman
Yasuaki, I added a bunch of printk's to try to better understand this. ia64_mv.setup does get initialized properly but then gets overwritten. It appears that it gets overwritten in __bind_irq_vector but I have not narrowed down exactly where. I put a printk at the top and bottom of this function

Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)

2007-07-24 Thread Doug Chapman
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 21:12 -0400, Doug Chapman wrote: > On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 09:19 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: > > Hi Doug, > > > > > > Yasuaki, > > > > > > With this patch it still panics in the same way. I am building with > > > CONFIG_IA64_GENERIC and booting on an HP rx6600. I do not

Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)

2007-07-24 Thread Doug Chapman
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 09:19 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: > Hi Doug, > > > > Yasuaki, > > > > With this patch it still panics in the same way. I am building with > > CONFIG_IA64_GENERIC and booting on an HP rx6600. I do not have the ski > > simulator either. > > > > I don't know what happen

Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)

2007-07-24 Thread Yasuaki Ishimatsu
Hi Doug, Doug Chapman wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 22:09 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: >> Hi Doug, >> >> Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: >>> Hi Doug, >>> >>> Doug Chapman wrote: On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 13:42 -0700, Luck, Tony wrote: >>> Could be, but it sounds like there's something fishy in t

Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)

2007-07-24 Thread Kenji Kaneshige
Yasuaki, > > Oops, I forgot to consider assign_irq_vector(AUTO_ASSIGN) case. > > I'm writing bug fix patch now. Wait a moment. > > Unfortunately, I don't have any ski simulator environment. I attached > the bug fix patch. Could you try this patch? > I tried your patch on my ski environment, and

Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)

2007-07-24 Thread Doug Chapman
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 22:09 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: > Hi Doug, > > Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: > > Hi Doug, > > > > Doug Chapman wrote: > >> On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 13:42 -0700, Luck, Tony wrote: > > Could be, but it sounds like there's something fishy in the current > > tree - Doug Cha

Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)

2007-07-24 Thread Yasuaki Ishimatsu
Hi Doug, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: > Hi Doug, > > Doug Chapman wrote: >> On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 13:42 -0700, Luck, Tony wrote: > Could be, but it sounds like there's something fishy in the current > tree - Doug Chapman is having problems as well, presumably on zx1 boxes. I am seeing the

Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)

2007-07-23 Thread Yasuaki Ishimatsu
Hi Doug, Doug Chapman wrote: > On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 13:42 -0700, Luck, Tony wrote: Could be, but it sounds like there's something fishy in the current tree - Doug Chapman is having problems as well, presumably on zx1 boxes. >>> I am seeing the panic on HP zx1 and zx2 systems. Currently

Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)

2007-07-23 Thread Doug Chapman
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 21:07 -0400, Doug Chapman wrote: > On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 13:42 -0700, Luck, Tony wrote: > > > > Could be, but it sounds like there's something fishy in the current > > > > tree - Doug Chapman is having problems as well, presumably on zx1 boxes. > > > > > > I am seeing the pani