Jeff Garzik wrote:
Siddharth Taneja wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to port our software system (uses a 2.4.20 kernel) to a
new platform which has a ICH6R controller. Due to some reasons we
cannot update our kernel to a more recent one (probably 2.4.27) which
has libata support in it. I can success
Hello, Jeff.
This is rewritten sil24 driver against v2.6.13-rc3. It seems to work
and am currently running stress test on it (random raw read of
concurrency 4, repeatitive mount/copy/checksup/unmount). I'll keep
running stress test for at least 12 hours and let you know if
something goes wrong
Gaaah - sorry forget that - it is NOT the sata II in this case, it is
still the S150 TX4
> -Original Message-
> From: Allen Bolderoff
> Sent: Thursday, 28 July 2005 10:49 AM
> To: Allen Bolderoff; 'linux-ide@vger.kernel.org'
> Subject: RE: More Promise PDC Probs with sata_promise
>
> Furt
Further to my last post,
I am now getting the problem occurring whilst untarring a kernel on a
hard drive located on the SATAII 150 controller
Gr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at ht
I too am having problems with the sata_promise driver in 2.6.12 with a Sata II
TX4, and a SATA on an intel SE7520BD2 board
First some Idea of what we are running -
Pristine Debian Sarge install
Stock Kernel 2.6.12.3 (with no extra patches)
Using the config from the 2
Timothy Thelin wrote:
Are there plans to eventually do them or is anyone actively working on them?
Such as?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majord
Well it doesn't seem that nasty to adopt flagged access. From a userland
API point of view how about adopting the IDE driver's taskfile mechanism,
and simply translating that into the yet-to-be internal flagged mechanism?
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
I'm interested in soft reset (1) and return response information (15). But
I didn't know who was doing what or had plans for what, which is why the
question was so general. If I end up working on these two myself, I'd be
nice to coordinate with existing efforts rather than collide with them =)
Timothy Thelin wrote:
I'm interested in soft reset (1) and return response information (15). But
I didn't know who was doing what or had plans for what, which is why the
question was so general. If I end up working on these two myself, I'd be
nice to coordinate with existing efforts rather tha
Are there plans to eventually do them or is anyone actively working on them?
Thanks,
Tim Thelin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
I have one, but I'm still working with my employer to make sure I'm allowed
to submit it.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: John W. Linville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 10:26 AM
To: Timothy Thelin
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ATA Passthru "status retu
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:13:13AM -0700, Timothy Thelin wrote:
> The libata code sets that field to 14 (the size of the whole status return
> descriptor), but the SAT spec (May 17) shows that field set to 12. Which is
> correct?
I'm sure the spec is correct...gotta patch? :-)
John
--
John W.
Hi,
The libata code sets that field to 14 (the size of the whole status return
descriptor), but the SAT spec (May 17) shows that field set to 12. Which is
correct?
Regards,
Tim Thelin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTEC
13 matches
Mail list logo