Mark Lord wrote:
> That's odd. Could you try that again,
> with the latest (either v7.3 or v7.4) version of hdparm
> (from sourceforge) ?
Using Debian's 7.3 via apt-get experimental - is that OK or would you like me to
compile the upstream?
2.6.21.1
cu:~# hdparm -V
hdparm v7.3
cu:~# hdparm -K1
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday 12 May 2007, Lee Trager wrote:
>
>> Currently when system which have HPA require HPA to be detected and
>> disabled upon resume from RAM or disk. The current IDE drivers do not do
>> this nor does libata(obviously it since it doesn't support
Hello.
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
The log of a typical IDE reset is available here:
http://petra.hos.u-szeged.hu/~wildy/syslog.gz
This was the worst case: the IDE bus was resetted during the system
boot.
Could you try setting HPT374_ALLOW_ATA133_6 to 0 in
drivers/ide/pci/hpt366.
Hi,
This patch has removed unused variable in pata_ispnp.
Yoichi
Signed-off-by: Yoichi Yuasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -pruN -X mips/Documentation/dontdiff mips-orig/drivers/ata/pata_isapnp.c
mips/drivers/ata/pata_isapnp.c
--- mips-orig/drivers/ata/pata_isapnp.c 2007-06-03 21:09:15.580982000 +0
Hello, I wrote:
I felt inspired by this explanation (thanks!) and took a look at
hpt374-opensource-v2.10 vendor driver. Here is something interesting:
glbdata.c:
...
#ifdef CLOCK_66MHZ
ULONG setting370_66[] = {
0xd029d5e, 0xd029d26, 0xc829ca6, 0xc829c84, 0xc829c62,
0x2
Hi all,
Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc4.
Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc.
http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions
SATA/PATA
Subject: 22-rc3 broke the CDROM in Dell notebook
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/27/63
Submitter : Gregor Jasn
Hi all,
Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc4
with patches available.
Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc.
http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions
PCI
Subject: Oops on 2.6.22-rc2 when unloading the cciss driver
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/24
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> SELinux
>
> Subject: very high non-preempt latency in context_struct_compute_av()
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/4/78
> Submitter : Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Handled-By : Stephen Smalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Jame
Hello.
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
There's no reason to have the speedproc() method wrapper for the two quite
different chip families, so just get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Tthis version of the patch properly installs the speedproc() method.
Ag
David Greaves wrote:
Mark Lord wrote:
That's odd. Could you try that again,
with the latest (either v7.3 or v7.4) version of hdparm
(from sourceforge) ?
Using Debian's 7.3 via apt-get experimental - is that OK or would you like me to
compile the upstream?
No, what you have is good, thanks.
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 06:30:52 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8587
>
>Summary: disk on promise pdc20378 disabled at boot
> Kernel Version: 2.6.22-rc4
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Owner: [EMAIL PROTE
Add a hidden configuration for an architecture or machine to
select to show that the pata_platform driver should be show
in the configuration.
This method is used to allow each individual machine/arch to
specify this, instead of creating large "depends on" on the
driver's Kconfig menu.
If this pa
From: Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:54:35 +0200
> Sparc64
>
> Subject: arch/sparc64/time.c doesn't compile on Ultra 1 (no PCI)
> References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8540
> Submitter : Horst H. von Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Status :
Hello, I wrote:
This looks promising. Using a vanilla 2.6.22-rc3 I was able to
reproduce
the problem within a few seconds. With the above modification the
machine
is running under heavy disk I/O without problems since 30 minutes...
Did it fix the problem for good?
It seems so far. There h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Nevermind, I did it myself:
This ensures that we can easily make changes specific to the PATA port
on the newer SATA chips, and also does what I've been requesting -- use
the standard ata_bmdma_error_handler(), rather than creating custom code
that achieves the same effect.
diff --git a/drivers
the PATA-port of SiS180 controller does not support a drive present status
in the pci configspace like the other SiS PATA controllers, check skipped.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Koziolek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_sis.c2007-06-05 22:17:10.0 +0200
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_sis.c
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 01:04:17 +0200
Uwe Koziolek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the PATA-port of SiS180 controller does not support a drive present status
> in the pci configspace like the other SiS PATA controllers, check skipped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Koziolek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Alan C
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 01:04:17AM +0200, Uwe Koziolek wrote:
> the PATA-port of SiS180 controller does not support a drive present status
> in the pci configspace like the other SiS PATA controllers, check skipped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Koziolek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_si
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 04:54:35PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> SATA/PATA
>
> Subject: libata reset-seq merge broke sata_sil on sh
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/10/63
> Submitter : Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Handled-By : Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Caused-By : com
Uwe Koziolek 写道:
When we used 2.6.18 and 2.6.20 on ASUS sis-671 motherboard, We have some
problem: cannot find the harddisk controller.
In BIOS, the SATA mode is 2P+2IDE.
The official kernel 2.6.18, 2.6.20 and new 2.6.21 does not work, i get
some information about sata
Hi Tejun,
Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi Tejun,
Setting the timeout to 15 did not help, either :-(. All your patches
are still in, of course.
Hmm... I'm out of ideas. I'll try it when I get back home.
Any news about this? At the end I had the impression that this is
a b
22 matches
Mail list logo
