[PATCH] sata_sil and PMP...

Hello, maybe I should have trusted SiliconImage... But, well, it is not true that you cannot use PMP with Sil 3512 and 3114. You can, if you try hard enough. Patch below tries hard enough ;-) Unfortunately it has few drawbacks: (1) Hardware ignores PMP field in received frames, so when D2H

Re: [PATCH] pata_via: Add Armia W730-K8 and other rebadgings

On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:57:48 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: More cable funnies Signed-off-by: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude linux.vanilla-2.6.23rc3-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_via.c linux-2.6.23rc3-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_via.c ---

Re: [PATCH #upstream-fixes] libata: fix n_sectors failure handling during revalidation

Tejun Heo wrote: If revalidation fails because device has different n_sectors after configuration the original n_sectors should be restored before failing revalidation. Without this fix, n_sectors difference will incorrectly and silently pass revalidation when revalidation is retried.

Re: [PATCH] pata_marvell: Add another PCI identifier

Alan Cox wrote: Signed-off-by: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude linux.vanilla-2.6.23rc3-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_marvell.c linux-2.6.23rc3-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_marvell.c --- linux.vanilla-2.6.23rc3-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_marvell.c

Re: [PATCH] pata_sis: Add the FSC Amilo and friends

Alan Cox wrote: More short cables Signed-off-by: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude linux.vanilla-2.6.23rc3-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_sis.c linux-2.6.23rc3-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_sis.c --- linux.vanilla-2.6.23rc3-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_sis.c

Re: [PATCH] pata_via: Add Armia W730-K8 and other rebadgings

Alan Cox wrote: More cable funnies Signed-off-by: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude linux.vanilla-2.6.23rc3-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_via.c linux-2.6.23rc3-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_via.c --- linux.vanilla-2.6.23rc3-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_via.c

Re: [PATCH #upstream-fixes] libata: don't check n_sectors during revalidation if zero

Tejun Heo wrote: If the initial configuration fails early, n_sectors is left at zero. Checking against it during revalidation makes retried configuration fail due to n_sectors mismatch. Ignore zero n_sectors during revalidation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

[git patches] libata fixes

Fixes + more laptop IDs Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/libata-core.c |7 ++- drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c | 18 +-

Problem with pata_via and HL-DT-ST GCE-8525B cdrom with kernels 2.6.22+

I have a problem with pata_via and a HL-DT-ST GCE-8525B cdrom, with kernels 2.6.22 and 2.6.23-rc3. When burning cds, the burning speed drop down to ~ 1. Also I have problems readind cds. With kernel 2.6.21, the cdrom work well. There are not error messages in dmesg and /var/log/messages, only

ATA_PIIX + SATA_MV - kernel ate my HDD

I have a device with Intel ICH4 IDE controller, and a Marvell SATA one. The device has one IDE and five SATA drives connected. Till now, I used the old IDE, and it worked fine: the system had a /dev/hda drive, and five /dev/sd[a-e] drives. Just today I compiled the kernel with PATA support

Re: ATA_PIIX + SATA_MV - kernel ate my HDD

On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:10:53 +0200 Tomasz Chmielewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a device with Intel ICH4 IDE controller, and a Marvell SATA one. The device has one IDE and five SATA drives connected. Whcih devices are connected to what ports ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: [PATCH resubmit] /drivers/ata ioremap returncode check

On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:34:58PM -0700, Brandon Philips wrote: On 19:47 Wed 22 Aug 2007, Scott Thompson wrote: Patchset against 2.6.23-rc3. corrects missing ioremap return checks, resending after making changes suggested Signed-off-by: Scott Thompson postfail at hushmail.com

Re: [PATCH resubmit] /drivers/ata ioremap returncode check

On 21:42 Thu 23 Aug 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:34:58PM -0700, Brandon Philips wrote: On 19:47 Wed 22 Aug 2007, Scott Thompson wrote: Patchset against 2.6.23-rc3. corrects missing ioremap return checks, resending after making changes suggested

[PATCH] pata_it821x: Fix regression/corruptor

Whoever did the PCI revision patch slipped up on the it821x, and I didn't spot this at the time either. They moved the check for the errata from the 0x10 revision to 0x11. Put it back This one is important for 2.6.23 final as in some cases bad things will occur if 0x10 revision boards don't get

[PATCH] pata_marvell: Add more identifiers

This replaces the patch which incorrectly removed the 6145 Signed-off-by: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude linux.vanilla-2.6.23rc3-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_marvell.c linux-2.6.23rc3-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_marvell.c ---

Re: File corruption in 2.6.18 thru 2.6.22

Dave Jones wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 02:42:45PM +, Neil Romig wrote: Everything is O.K using kernel 2.6.17.14, but 2.6.18 and beyond all have this problem. It may take me months to sort this out on my own - any suggestions? In most (though not all), a single bit was flipped.

[PATCH resubmit] /drivers/ata ioremap returncode check

Patchset against 2.6.23-rc3. corrects missing ioremap return checks, resending after fixing for documentation making changes suggested... As for suggestions, I did fix the {} that weren't needed. I did not add in a printk err or warn statement as the rest of the module does not contain these

sata_via.c: TO DO: VT6421 PATA support

Lines 33-34 of sata_via.c of 2.6.23-rc3 say: * To-do list: * - VT6421 PATA support Wasn't VT6421 PATA support already added in 2.6.21? -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]