On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:43:45AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
I believe I have a small PCI card here with an HPT366 chip on it.
Does anyone there want it before I throw it away?
I already have a 372. It should be almost the same, right?
They are not very similar no. HPT37x is a progression
RESEND as TEXT FORMAT
- Original Message -
From: jameshsu
To: Jeff Garzik
Cc: Andrew Morton ; IDE/ATA development list ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Matti
Aarnio ; James Bottomley ; Jason Wu ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Daniel Weng
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 7:28 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Should
Alan Cox wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:43:45AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
I believe I have a small PCI card here with an HPT366 chip on it.
Does anyone there want it before I throw it away?
I already have a 372. It should be almost the same, right?
They are not very similar no. HPT37x is
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 09:16:35 +0200
Denys Fedoryshchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it work as kernel parameter?
I tried libata_dma_mask=0x4 and to set 0xf or 0xff - doesn't help. How to
disable DMA in libata, if it is compiled in kernel?
libata.dma_mask=3
will leave you with CD and disk
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:14:56 +0900
Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By default ata_host_activate() expects a valid IRQ in order to
successfully register the host. This patch enables a special case
for registering polling-only hosts that either don't have IRQs
or have buggy IRQ generation
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 11:20:18 +0900
Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a presentation of true workmanship, pata_ali asserts IRQ
permanantly if the TF status register is read more than once when
there's no device attached to the port.
Avoid waiting polling for !0xff if it's PATA. It's
FYI
- Original Message -
From: LaurenceWu
To: jameshsu
Cc: Jason Wu ; DerweiChen (陳德威)
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: Should be Acard ATP8620 2SATA / 1 IDE driver
Hi James,
We didn't study about ata/ahci.c, but it should be based on AHCI1.0 or 1.1
spec. That is,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
* -dma_off_quietly is always called before ide_set_dma()
so the call can be moved inside ide_set_dma().
* ide_dma_check() doesn't touch hardware so -dma_off_quietly
call for 'rc == -1' case is redundant, remove it.
* '0' and '-1' are the only values
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Based on pata_sc1200.c.
There should be no functionality changes caused by this patch.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MBR, Sergei
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Mark Lord wrote:
sata_qstor fix oops on rmmod.
sata_qstor likes to disable the chip on module unload,
so it provides a libata host_stop method to do this.
But in recent kernels, this routine is now called too late,
after the PCI mmio resources have already been released.
Which produces an oops.
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 07:28:38PM +0800, jameshsu wrote:
Not really understand your patch listed below.
We do not provide ahci.c file to you, so we don't know where the patch came
from(diff from where)??
Who create this and how can we get ahci.c file?? Can you tell us??
The file is found
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 07:34:22PM +0800, jameshsu wrote:
From: LaurenceWu
We didn't study about ata/ahci.c, but it should be based on AHCI1.0 or 1.1
spec. That is, NO P.M. FIS base switching, but supports both non-NCQ and NCQ
protocols.
For NCQ or nonNCQ, 8620 is very AHCI-like, although
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 06:44:31PM +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
Doesn't help
WRAP ~ #cat /proc/cmdline
console=ttyS0,38400n8 libata.dma_mask=3
It's libata.dma if its built into the kernel, or 'dma' module option
if built as a kernel module.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this
Andrew Morton wrote, On 11/07/2007 09:13 PM:
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:15:07 +0100 Roberto Oppedisano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello.
I noticed that after suspending to ram the DVD-ROM/CDRW
drive in no more recognized on my laptop. Looking at dmesg
after suspend i found:
[5.313446]
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:49:58AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:43:59 +0100 Roberto Oppedisano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote, On 11/07/2007 09:13 PM:
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:15:07 +0100 Roberto Oppedisano [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 12:02:27PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
From: Yann Chachkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please warmly welcome the PRO variant of Satellite U200 to the broken
suspend list.
Original patch is from Yann Chachkoff. Patch reformatted and
forwarded by Tejun Heo.
Signed-off-by:
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:02:56 -0500 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:49:58AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:43:59 +0100 Roberto Oppedisano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote, On 11/07/2007 09:13 PM:
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:52:55AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
sata_qstor nuke idle state.
We're really only ever in one of two hardware states: packet, or mmio.
Get rid of unnecessary qs_state_idle state.
This belongs in 2.6.24.
Signed-off-by: Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED]
applied patches
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:14:56AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
By default ata_host_activate() expects a valid IRQ in order to
successfully register the host. This patch enables a special case
for registering polling-only hosts that either don't have IRQs
or have buggy IRQ generation (either in
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:20:18AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
In a presentation of true workmanship, pata_ali asserts IRQ
permanantly if the TF status register is read more than once when
there's no device attached to the port.
Avoid waiting polling for !0xff if it's PATA. It's needed only for
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 01:09:00PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Port / host stop calls used to be made from ata_host_release() which
is called after all hardware resources acquired after host allocation
are released. This is wrong as port and host stop routines often
access the hardware.
Add
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:13:41AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:02:56 -0500 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:49:58AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:43:59 +0100 Roberto Oppedisano [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:13:41AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
I suspect it wold be best to disable the feature for the 2.6.24 release,
then reenable it afterwards and keep doing this until the code is
sufficiently stable.
GTF method execution failure currently looks like it's fatal, when it
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:43:59 +0100 Roberto Oppedisano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote, On 11/07/2007 09:13 PM:
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:15:07 +0100 Roberto Oppedisano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello.
I noticed that after suspending to ram the DVD-ROM/CDRW
drive in no more
(Same symptoms/behaviour as before:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-idem=117949823328798w=2
http://marc.info/?t=11781097043r=1w=2)
With mem=3500M all is well, otherwise it goes on reseting the ports in a loop
not booting :-(
Thanks
Hari
Feel safe with award winning spam
Luca Tettamanti wrote:
On Nov 7, 2007 1:55 PM, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Florian La Roche wrote:
Hello all,
I've taking email addresses from the last NCQ blacklist changes going
into the kernel.
This Fujitsu drive also gives me spurious command completions. Detailed
output also
On Nov 9, 2007 12:32 AM, Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luca Tettamanti wrote:
On Nov 7, 2007 1:55 PM, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Florian La Roche wrote:
Hello all,
I've taking email addresses from the last NCQ blacklist changes going
into the kernel.
This Fujitsu
Mark Lord wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
In a presentation of true workmanship, pata_ali asserts IRQ
permanantly if the TF status register is read more than once when
there's no device attached to the port.
..
Is using the altstatus reg (rather than status reg), when possible,
a better idea
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 21:56:32 +0200
Denys Fedoryshchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, it works like that.
Seems in libata there is no fall-back to non-DMA mode, if DMA didn't work.
It should be falling back from UDMA or MWDMA to PIO, if not please file a
bug
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 03:19:52PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:52:26PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
..
2) This chip includes target mode support. Very nice, well done!
I hope that standard AHCI eventually supports this nice feature!
On Nov 7, 2007 1:55 PM, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Florian La Roche wrote:
Hello all,
I've taking email addresses from the last NCQ blacklist changes going
into the kernel.
This Fujitsu drive also gives me spurious command completions. Detailed
output also available at
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:52:26PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
..
2) This chip includes target mode support. Very nice, well done!
I hope that standard AHCI eventually supports this nice feature!
..
Speaking of which. Do we have a strategy as to how to implement/support
Thanks, it works like that.
Seems in libata there is no fall-back to non-DMA mode, if DMA didn't work.
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 12:31:39 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 06:44:31PM +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
Doesn't help
WRAP ~ #cat /proc/cmdline
console=ttyS0,38400n8
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:19:05 -0500 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:13:41AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:02:56 -0500 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:49:58AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
..
I
Jeff Garzik wrote:
..
2) This chip includes target mode support. Very nice, well done!
I hope that standard AHCI eventually supports this nice feature!
..
Speaking of which. Do we have a strategy as to how to implement/support
the target side of target mode on controllers which can do it?
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:19:05 -0500 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:13:41AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:02:56 -0500 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:49:58AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 08 Nov
Experience suggests that the _GTF method may be bad. We currently fail
device revalidation in that case, which seems excessive.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
index 08a52dd..545ea86 100644
---
Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
Thanks, it works like that.
Seems in libata there is no fall-back to non-DMA mode, if DMA didn't work.
There is, it's just too conservative about that. With improvements
pending for 2.6.24, it should be quite snappy at falling back to PIO if
configured transfer
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:49:33 -0500 Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:19:05 -0500 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:13:41AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:02:56 -0500 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 03:19:52PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
..
MMmm.. I wonder what the most common use case is for target mode?
Everybody I've dealt with thus far uses it as a high-speed local comms
interface,
which would suggest that it might be done as a network
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 03:49:17PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 03:19:52PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
..
MMmm.. I wonder what the most common use case is for target mode?
Everybody I've dealt with thus far uses it as a high-speed local comms
interface,
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 09:02:35AM +0700, Riki Oktarianto wrote:
Some BIOSen map AHCI ABAR but lock the SATA controller to IDE mode.
This patch add quirk to set AHCI mode on ICH board with such case.
Tested on Macbook2,1 (ICH7M)
Intel will complain but it's awful tempting...
Jeff
Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 09:02:35AM +0700, Riki Oktarianto wrote:
Some BIOSen map AHCI ABAR but lock the SATA controller to IDE mode.
This patch add quirk to set AHCI mode on ICH board with such case.
Tested on Macbook2,1 (ICH7M)
Intel will complain but it's awful
Hi All,
I am working on an AHCI SATA controller. For each port, there is one
FIS descriptor and one Command List, which points to a Received FIS
structure and Command List structure. So what is Received FIS
structure? The Command List structure points to Command Table, that
has Command FIS field
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:29:37PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
And I might even privately patch my own kernels to map the ACHI BAR
in the cases where the BIOS didn't...
The inability to do this in the general case is the main reason why
AHCI was not unconditionally enabled, even in IDE mode, when
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:38:25PM -0500, mike zheng wrote:
I am working on an AHCI SATA controller. For each port, there is one
FIS descriptor and one Command List, which points to a Received FIS
structure and Command List structure. So what is Received FIS
structure? The Command List
Srihari Vijayaraghavan wrote:
(Same symptoms/behaviour as before:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-idem=117949823328798w=2
http://marc.info/?t=11781097043r=1w=2)
With mem=3500M all is well, otherwise it goes on reseting the ports in a loop
not booting :-(
Hmmm.. weird. The workaround
Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:29:37PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
And I might even privately patch my own kernels to map the ACHI BAR
in the cases where the BIOS didn't...
The inability to do this in the general case is the main reason why
AHCI was not unconditionally enabled,
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:44:22PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:29:37PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
And I might even privately patch my own kernels to map the ACHI BAR
in the cases where the BIOS didn't...
The inability to do this in the general case is
49 matches
Mail list logo
