Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: buggy cmd640 message followed by soft lockup)

2007-11-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: [ I removed Frans from cc: since it is off-topic to the original bugreport ] On Saturday 24 November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Saturday, 24 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: [--snip--] Rafael, I

Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: buggy cmd640 message followed by soft lockup)

2007-11-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:11:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: ... On Saturday 24 November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Saturday, 24 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: ... - zillion other little

Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: buggy cmd640 message followed by soft lockup)

2007-11-25 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Hi, On Sunday 25 November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: [ I removed Frans from cc: since it is off-topic to the original bugreport ] On Saturday 24 November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Saturday, 24 of November

Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: buggy cmd640 message followed by soft lockup)

2007-11-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:11:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: ... On Saturday 24 November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Saturday, 24 of November 2007, Bartlomiej

Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: buggy cmd640 message followed by soft lockup)

2007-11-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: Hi, On Sunday 25 November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: [ I removed Frans from cc: since it is off-topic to the original bugreport ] On

Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: buggy cmd640 message followed by soft lockup)

2007-11-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 09:07:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:11:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: ... On Saturday 24 November 2007,

Re: 2.6.24-rc3-mm1: I/O error, system hangs

2007-11-25 Thread Laurent Riffard
Le 25.11.2007 08:37, James Bottomley a écrit : On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 23:59 +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote: Le 24.11.2007 14:26, James Bottomley a écrit : OK, could you post dmesgs again, please. I actually tested this with an aic79xx card, and for me it does cause Domain Validation to succeed

Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: buggy cmd640 message followed by soft lockup)

2007-11-25 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* Rafael J. Wysocki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: snip (many levels of quote) * Bugs that sit in NEEDINFO state for more than i.e. one month should be automatically closed. I agree that we probably should do something like this. Not automatically. OK, say as a rule. The

Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: buggy cmd640 message followed by soft lockup)

2007-11-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 09:07:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:11:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Bartlomiej

Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: buggy cmd640 message followed by soft lockup)

2007-11-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:28:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: .. First of all, Bugzilla is a quite often used bug tracker in the open source world [1], so many users already know it. But more important, it pretends to require them

Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: buggy cmd640 message followed by soft lockup)

2007-11-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:28:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: .. First of all, Bugzilla is a quite often used bug tracker in the open source world [1], so many users already know

Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: buggy cmd640 message followed by soft lockup)

2007-11-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:28:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: [--snip--] Even worse: Different people have different

Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: buggy cmd640 message followed by soft lockup)

2007-11-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:38:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:28:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: .. First of all, Bugzilla is a quite often used

[PATCH] sata_nv: don't use legacy DMA in ADMA mode (v3)

2007-11-25 Thread Robert Hancock
We need to run any DMA command with result taskfile requested in ADMA mode when the port is in ADMA mode, otherwise it may try to use the legacy DMA engine in ADMA mode which is not allowed. Enforce this with BUG_ON() since data corruption could potentially result if this happened. Also, fail any

Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: buggy cmd640 message followed by soft lockup)

2007-11-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:38:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:28:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:

Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: buggy cmd640 message followed by soft lockup)

2007-11-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:28:17AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:38:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:28:06PM +0100, Rafael J.

Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: buggy cmd640 message followed by soft lockup)

2007-11-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 26 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:28:17AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:38:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] OF-platform PATA driver

2007-11-25 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:50:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Friday 23 November 2007, Anton Vorontsov wrote: Here is the PATA Platform driver using OF infrastructure. Mostly it's just a wrapper around a bit modified pata_platform driver. Thanks a lot for doing this. Patches 2/3

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] OF-platform PATA driver

2007-11-25 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 04:26:13PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 07:49:33PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Anton Vorontsov wrote: Here is the PATA Platform driver using OF infrastructure. Mostly it's just a wrapper around a bit modified pata_platform driver. Patches

Re: [PATCH 3/3] [POWERPC] MPC8349E-mITX: introduce pata node, make use pata_of_platform driver

2007-11-25 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:57:46PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Friday 23 November 2007, Anton Vorontsov wrote: +static struct of_device_id mpc834x_ids[] = { +   { .compatible = pata-platform, }, +   {}, +}; + +static int __init mpc834x_declare_of_platform_devices(void)

Re: buggy cmd640 message followed by soft lockup

2007-11-25 Thread Frans Pop
(Dropped Rafael from CC) On Sunday 25 November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: So either something went very very wrong or the oops itself is incorrect. Please put BUG() before the put_cmd640_reg() above so the next time BUG happens we will know which one is it. I've spent quite a bit

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] OF-platform PATA driver

2007-11-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 03:23:14AM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote: On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 04:26:13PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 07:49:33PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Anton Vorontsov wrote: Here is the PATA Platform driver using OF infrastructure. Mostly it's

Re: [PATCH] sata_nv: don't use legacy DMA in ADMA mode (v3)

2007-11-25 Thread Tejun Heo
Robert Hancock wrote: We need to run any DMA command with result taskfile requested in ADMA mode when the port is in ADMA mode, otherwise it may try to use the legacy DMA engine in ADMA mode which is not allowed. Enforce this with BUG_ON() since data corruption could potentially result if

Re: spurious completions during NCQ on rt kernel

2007-11-25 Thread Mark Lord
jozwicki wrote: Hello, On Linux localhost 2.6.24-rc2-rt1 #5 SMP PREEMPT RT Sat Nov 24 13:39:15 CET 2007 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux under heavy load I get this kind of error: [27442.074715] ata3.00: exception Emask 0x2 SAct 0xd SErr 0x0 action 0x2

[PATCH 2/2] ide-scsi: use print_hex_dump from linux/kernel.h

2007-11-25 Thread Denis Cheng
these utilities implemented in lib/hexdump.c are more handy, please use this. Cc: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- there are still much other private hexdump implementations in the source, which reinvent the wheel, we can find them through: $ grep

Re: 2.6.24-rc3-mm1: I/O error, system hangs

2007-11-25 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 07:44:13PM +0200, James Bottomley wrote: Probing intermittent failures in Domain Validation, even with the fixes applied leads me to the conclusion that there are further problems with this commit: commit fc5eb4facedbd6d7117905e775cee1975f894e79 Author: Hannes