On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
[ I removed Frans from cc: since it is off-topic to the original bugreport ]
On Saturday 24 November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 24 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
[--snip--]
Rafael, I
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:11:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
...
On Saturday 24 November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 24 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
...
- zillion other little
Hi,
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
[ I removed Frans from cc: since it is off-topic to the original bugreport ]
On Saturday 24 November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 24 of November
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:11:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
...
On Saturday 24 November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 24 of November 2007, Bartlomiej
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
[ I removed Frans from cc: since it is off-topic to the original
bugreport ]
On
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 09:07:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:11:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
...
On Saturday 24 November 2007,
Le 25.11.2007 08:37, James Bottomley a écrit :
On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 23:59 +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 24.11.2007 14:26, James Bottomley a écrit :
OK, could you post dmesgs again, please. I actually tested this
with an
aic79xx card, and for me it does cause Domain Validation to succeed
* Rafael J. Wysocki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
snip
(many levels of quote)
* Bugs that sit in NEEDINFO state for more than i.e. one month should be
automatically closed.
I agree that we probably should do something like this.
Not automatically.
OK, say as a rule.
The
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 09:07:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:11:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Bartlomiej
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:28:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
..
First of all, Bugzilla is a quite often used bug tracker in the open
source world [1], so many users already know it.
But more important, it pretends to require them
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:28:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
..
First of all, Bugzilla is a quite often used bug tracker in the open
source world [1], so many users already know
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:28:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
[--snip--]
Even worse:
Different people have different
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:38:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:28:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
..
First of all, Bugzilla is a quite often used
We need to run any DMA command with result taskfile requested in ADMA mode
when the port is in ADMA mode, otherwise it may try to use the legacy DMA engine
in ADMA mode which is not allowed. Enforce this with BUG_ON() since data
corruption could potentially result if this happened. Also, fail any
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:38:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:28:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:28:17AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:38:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:28:06PM +0100, Rafael J.
On Monday, 26 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:28:17AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:38:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:50:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 23 November 2007, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Here is the PATA Platform driver using OF infrastructure.
Mostly it's just a wrapper around a bit modified pata_platform
driver.
Thanks a lot for doing this. Patches 2/3
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 04:26:13PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 07:49:33PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Here is the PATA Platform driver using OF infrastructure.
Mostly it's just a wrapper around a bit modified pata_platform
driver.
Patches
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:57:46PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 23 November 2007, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
+static struct of_device_id mpc834x_ids[] = {
+ { .compatible = pata-platform, },
+ {},
+};
+
+static int __init mpc834x_declare_of_platform_devices(void)
(Dropped Rafael from CC)
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
So either something went very very wrong or the oops itself is incorrect.
Please put BUG() before the put_cmd640_reg() above so the next time
BUG happens we will know which one is it.
I've spent quite a bit
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 03:23:14AM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 04:26:13PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 07:49:33PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Here is the PATA Platform driver using OF infrastructure.
Mostly it's
Robert Hancock wrote:
We need to run any DMA command with result taskfile requested in ADMA mode
when the port is in ADMA mode, otherwise it may try to use the legacy DMA
engine
in ADMA mode which is not allowed. Enforce this with BUG_ON() since data
corruption could potentially result if
jozwicki wrote:
Hello,
On Linux localhost 2.6.24-rc2-rt1 #5 SMP PREEMPT RT Sat Nov 24 13:39:15
CET 2007 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+
AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
under heavy load I get this kind of error:
[27442.074715] ata3.00: exception Emask 0x2 SAct 0xd SErr 0x0 action
0x2
these utilities implemented in lib/hexdump.c are more handy, please use this.
Cc: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
there are still much other private hexdump implementations in the source,
which reinvent the wheel, we can find them through:
$ grep
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 07:44:13PM +0200, James Bottomley wrote:
Probing intermittent failures in Domain Validation, even with the fixes
applied leads me to the conclusion that there are further problems with
this commit:
commit fc5eb4facedbd6d7117905e775cee1975f894e79
Author: Hannes
26 matches
Mail list logo