On Sunday 27 February 2005 08:36, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, Bartlomiej.
This patch should be modified to use flagged taskfile if the
task_end_request_fix patch isn't applied. As non-flagged taskfile
won't return valid result registers, TASK ioctl users won't get the
correct register
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 03:36:44PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
+ tf-device = 0x40;
Wouldn't ATA_LBA be clearer?
I will change it, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
Hi,
On Monday 28 February 2005 16:24, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hi,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Sunday 27 February 2005 08:36, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, Bartlomiej.
This patch should be modified to use flagged taskfile if the
task_end_request_fix patch isn't applied. As non
On Monday 28 February 2005 16:12, Tejun Heo wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Sunday 27 February 2005 05:51, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, Bartlomiej,
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 03:45:39PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Original patch from Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED
* add ide_tf_get_address() helper
* use it in idedisk_read_native_max_address[_ext]()
and idedisk_set_max_address[_ext]()
diff -Nru a/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c b/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c2005-02-19 17:22:32 +01:00
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c2005-02-19 17:22:32
Higher bits (16-23) of the address were ignored
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -Nru a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c 2005-02-19 17:38:53 +01:00
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c 2005-02-19 17:38:53 +01:00
@@ -238,9
applied to ide-dev-2.6, thanks
I need some more time for the other patches
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Andrew,
ide-dev-2.6 is fixed now and can be added back to -mm.
ChangeLog:
* fix OOPS in task_end_request()
* add VIA VT6410 support (Mathias Kretschmer)
* fix unneeded LBA48 taskfile registers access
* fix io_32bit race in ide_taskfile_ioctl() (Tejun Heo)
BK users:
bk pull
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:51:47 -0700, Gary Poppitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First off, I have the libdata-2.6 pull.
The version of sata_promise.c is 1.58 .
Is this the latest one available?
Next question, in function pdc_qc_issue_prot, there is a BUG() call in
the case of
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:53:56 -0500, Prarit Bhargava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bartlomiej pointed out that the sgiioc4.c changes have made their way
all changes
into Linus' tree.
Here's an updated change set.
Thanks,
P.
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:13:19 +0900 (KST), Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
11_ide_pci_pdc202xx_old_merge.patch
Merges ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.h into pdc202xx_old.c.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
applied
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:13:19 +0900 (KST), Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
12_ide_pci_piix_merge.patch
Merges ide/pci/piix.h into piix.c.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
applied
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:13:19 +0900 (KST), Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
13_ide_pci_serverworks_cleanup.patch
Removes unused SVWKS_DEBUG_DRIVE_INFO from ide/pci/serverworks
driver.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
applied
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
applied, thanks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
@@ -161,8 +161,6 @@
return ide_stopped;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(do_rw_taskfile);
-
Is this patch against -mm or ide-dev-2.6?
do_rw_taskfile() is still needed for ide-disk.c in linus' tree,
the other two exports can be removed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
I put some more thought into this change... details below...
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 11:15:56 +0900 (KST), Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -705,24 +705,17 @@ static int idedisk_issue_flush(request_q
{
ide_drive_t *drive = q-queuedata;
struct request *rq;
+
Hi,
ChangeLog:
* sync with linux-2.6 tree
* merge convert IDE device drivers to driver model serie
(except the last patch which is the actual conversion :)
* fix ATAPI Power Management
BK users:
bk pull bk://bart.bkbits.net/ide-dev-2.6
This will update the following files:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:32:29 +0100, Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03 2005, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:37:10 +0100, Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03 2005, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:54:48 +0900
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:55:38 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
12_ide_hwgroup_t_polling.patch
ide_hwgroup_t.polling field added. 0 in poll_timeout field
used to indicate inactive polling but because 0 is a valid
jiffy value, though slim, there's a chance that
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 10:06:29 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:15:59 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
25_ide_taskfile_cmd.patch
All in-kernel REQ_DRIVE_CMD users except for ide_cmd_ioctl
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:47:12 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
05_ide_merge_pci_driver_hc.patch
Merges drivers/ide/pci/*.h files into their corresponding *.c
files. Rationales are
1. There's no reason to separate pci drivers into header and
body. No
* add ide_drives list to list devices without a driver
* add __ide_add_setting() and use it for adding no auto remove entries
* kill ide-default pseudo-driver
diff -Nru a/drivers/ide/Makefile b/drivers/ide/Makefile
--- a/drivers/ide/Makefile 2005-02-04 03:32:17 +01:00
+++
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:01:54 +0100, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch contains the following possible cleanups:
- make some needlessly global code static
- ide-dma.c: remove the unneeded EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ide_dma_test_irq)
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
applied
-
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:44:54 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
02_ide_cleanup_it8172.patch
In drivers/ide/pci/it8172.h, it8172_ratefilter() and
init_setup_it8172() are declared and the latter is referenced
in it8172_chipsets. Both functions are not defined or
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:52:48 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
10_ide_do_rw_disk_pre_task_out_intr_return_fix.patch
In __ide_do_rw_disk(), ide_started used to be returned blindly
after issusing PIO write. This can cause hang if
pre_task_out_intr() returns
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:55:38 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
12_ide_hwgroup_t_polling.patch
ide_hwgroup_t.polling field added. 0 in poll_timeout field
used to indicate inactive polling but because 0 is a valid
jiffy value, though slim, there's a chance that
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:54:48 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
11_ide_drive_sleeping_fix.patch
ide_drive_t.sleeping field added. 0 in sleep field used to
indicate inactive sleeping but because 0 is a valid jiffy
value, though slim, there's a chance that
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:51:42 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
09_ide_do_rw_disk_lba48_dma_check_fix.patch
In __ide_do_rw_disk(), the shifted block, instead of the
original rq-sector, should be used when checking range for
lba48 dma.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:56:49 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
13_ide_tape_time_after.patch
Explicit jiffy comparision converted to time_after() macro.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
applied
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:57:28 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
14_ide_error_remove_NULL_test.patch
In ide_error(), drive cannot be NULL. ide_dump_status() can't
handle NULL drive.
applied, you missed Signed-off-by line
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:56:41 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:54:49 -0600, Doug Maxey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:32:53 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
The datacenters/server folks that would be using these drives
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:19:35 -0600, Tyler Montbriand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been stuck using kernel 2.6.4 for the last year or so for various
reasons, and now I'm in a vicious catch-22. If I don't upgrade, I can't use
NPTL, therefore my system will continue to be susceptible to the
1301 - 1332 of 1332 matches
Mail list logo
