hi Matthew,
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 06:35, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:46:20AM -0700, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
Finally they replied and asked to rediff it against their
git tree. I did that and sent patches back. No reply since
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 10:56, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:13:56PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:52:32PM +0100, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
Btw, I used to test every -mm kernel. But since I've switched distros
(gentoo-ubuntu)
and I have less
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 11:57, Gabriel C wrote:
The main problem is finding experienced developers who spend time on
looking into bug reports.
There are already. IMO the problem is the development model.
There are tons new features in each new kernel release and 'tons new bugs'
which
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 00:27, Adrian Bunk wrote:
You missed the following in my email:
we slowly scare them away due to the many bug reports without any
reaction.
The problem is that bug reports take time. If you go away from easy
things like compile errors then even things like
On Tuesday 30 October 2007 12:41, Ralf Baechle wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:34:29AM +, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Thursday 25 October 2007 22:41, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
-static const struct ide_port_info generic_chipsets[] __devinitdata = {
+static struct
On Thursday 25 October 2007 22:41, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
-static const struct ide_port_info generic_chipsets[] __devinitdata = {
+static struct ide_port_info generic_chipsets[] __devinitdata = {
/* 0 */ DECLARE_GENERIC_PCI_DEV(Unknown, 0),
{ /* 1 */
I
