Re: [PATCH 2.6.22-rc7] libata: fix assigned IRQ reporting

2007-07-10 Thread Francois Romieu
Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [...] H... Weird. Can you please apply the attached patch and post boot dmesg? Thanks. It works perfectly in 2.6.22 but the .config is not the same. I'll report if it makes a difference. -- Ueimor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH 2.6.22-rc7] libata: fix assigned IRQ reporting

2007-07-05 Thread Francois Romieu
Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [...] Apparently, I'm more confused than you are. My master was at 872aad45 but my index was at rc7. Can you please force checkout the head and re-test? I've tested both native and legacy modes and it's fixed here. I have done a forced checkout + mrproper

Re: [PATCH 2.6.22-rc7] libata: fix assigned IRQ reporting

2007-07-04 Thread Francois Romieu
Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Tejun Heo wrote: Francois Romieu wrote: I have rebuilt on top of 872aad45d6174570dd2e1defc3efee50f2cfcc72 and it still seems bizarre: Okay, 872aad45 doesn't have the patch yet. Either apply the patch manually or you need to wait a bit more. I am confused

Re: [PATCH 2.6.22-rc7] libata: fix assigned IRQ reporting

2007-07-03 Thread Francois Romieu
Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Francois Romieu wrote: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [...@ The port info printing in ata_host_register() doesn't fit all the different controllers. It should probably be moved out to LLDs with some helpers in the future. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH 2.6.22-rc7] libata: fix assigned IRQ reporting

2007-07-02 Thread Francois Romieu
Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] : host-irq and host-irq2 should be set before ata_host_register() for IRQ reporting to work. Move up host-irq assignment in ata_host_activate() and add it to ata_pci_init_one() native path and pata_cs5520. The port info printing in ata_host_register() doesn't

Re: Silent corruption with r8169

2007-04-04 Thread Francois Romieu
Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Aaron Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [adding netdev] [meta-comment: I wish people wouldn't use such unnecessarily broad subjects -- how is it the x86-64 port's or AMD's fault when you have broken hardware? Would anybody write Silent corruption on i386 or

Re: Silent corruption with r8169

2007-04-04 Thread Francois Romieu
Aaron Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [...] I'll try to get to testing this, but I'm wondering if people may have misunderstood my original post. I don't get any corruption over Ethernet; it's just corruption on the filesystem during certain load patterns that involve the Realtek ethernet card.