On Saturday 03 March 2007, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> [PATCH] cmd64x: fix recovery time calculation
>
> The driver wrongly takes the address setup time into account when calculating
> the PIO recovery time -- this leads to slight overclocking of the PIO modes 0
> and 1 (so, the prayers failed to he
[PATCH] cmd64x: fix recovery time calculation
The driver wrongly takes the address setup time into account when calculating
the PIO recovery time -- this leads to slight overclocking of the PIO modes 0
and 1 (so, the prayers failed to help, as usual :-). Rework the code to be
calculating recovery
On Monday 26 February 2007, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> The driver wrongly takes the address setup time into account when calculating
> the PIO recovery time -- this leads to slight overclocking of the PIO modes 0
> and 1 (so, the prayers failed to help, as usual :-). Rework the code to be
> calcula
The driver wrongly takes the address setup time into account when calculating
the PIO recovery time -- this leads to slight overclocking of the PIO modes 0
and 1 (so, the prayers failed to help, as usual :-). Rework the code to be
calculating recovery clock count as a difference between the total
On Friday 09 February 2007 23:29, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> The driver wrongly takes the address setup time into account when calculating
> the PIO recovery time -- this leads to slight overclocking of the PIO modes 0
> and 1 (so, the prayers failed to help, as usual :-). Rework the code to be
> c
The driver wrongly takes the address setup time into account when calculating
the PIO recovery time -- this leads to slight overclocking of the PIO modes 0
and 1 (so, the prayers failed to help, as usual :-). Rework the code to be
calculating recovery clock count as a difference between the total