ata_check_status() does an SFF compliant check
ata_chk_status() does a generic call to ap->ops->check_status (usually
ata_check_status)
libata-sff uses the wrong one. Hardly suprising given the naming here,
which ought to get fixed to ata_sff_check_status() perhaps ?
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMA
Alan Cox wrote:
ata_check_status() does an SFF compliant check
ata_chk_status() does a generic call to ap->ops->check_status (usually
ata_check_status)
libata-sff uses the wrong one. Hardly suprising given the naming here,
which ought to get fixed to ata_sff_check_status() perhaps ?
Signed-off-
> > + tf->command = ata_chk_status(ap);
> > tf->feature = ioread8(ioaddr->error_addr);
> > tf->nsect = ioread8(ioaddr->nsect_addr);
> > tf->lbal = ioread8(ioaddr->lbal_addr);
>
> applied, with a sigh: it's in SFF, so I saw nothing wrong with
> ata_check_status(). I checked -- no S
Alan Cox wrote:
+ tf->command = ata_chk_status(ap);
tf->feature = ioread8(ioaddr->error_addr);
tf->nsect = ioread8(ioaddr->nsect_addr);
tf->lbal = ioread8(ioaddr->lbal_addr);
applied, with a sigh: it's in SFF, so I saw nothing wrong with
ata_check_status(). I chec
