Alan Cox wrote:
It is legitimate (although annoying and silly) for a PCI IDE controller
not to be assigned an interrupt and to be polled. The libata-sff code
should therefore not try and request IRQ 0 in this case.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
applied #upstream-fixes (2.6.24)
Alan Cox wrote:
> It is legitimate (although annoying and silly) for a PCI IDE controller
> not to be assigned an interrupt and to be polled. The libata-sff code
> should therefore not try and request IRQ 0 in this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff -u --new-file --rec
It is legitimate (although annoying and silly) for a PCI IDE controller
not to be assigned an interrupt and to be polled. The libata-sff code
should therefore not try and request IRQ 0 in this case.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src
