On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 09:00 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Shaohua Li wrote:
Not sure, this is just to call a BIOS routine, but a check should be
safer. Thanks!
ACPI spec (ver 3.0a, p289) requires IDE power on/off executes ACPI _PSx
methods. As recently most PATA drivers use libata, this
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 12:16 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Index: linux/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
===
--- linux.orig/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c2007-11-01 10:54:25.0
+0800
+++ linux/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
Shaohua Li wrote:
Not sure, this is just to call a BIOS routine, but a check should be
safer. Thanks!
ACPI spec (ver 3.0a, p289) requires IDE power on/off executes ACPI _PSx
methods. As recently most PATA drivers use libata, this patch adds _PSx
method support in libata. ACPI spec doesn't
On Friday, 2 November 2007 02:32, Shaohua Li wrote:
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 10:04 +, Alan Cox wrote:
+ max_devices = ata_link_max_devices(ap-link);
+
+ for (i = 0; i max_devices; ++i) {
+ struct ata_device *dev = ap-link.device[i];
Better to use:
ok.
+ max_devices = ata_link_max_devices(ap-link);
+
+ for (i = 0; i max_devices; ++i) {
+ struct ata_device *dev = ap-link.device[i];
Better to use:
ata_link_for_each_dev(dev, ap-link) {
+
+ if (dev-acpi_handle)
+
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 10:04 +, Alan Cox wrote:
+ max_devices = ata_link_max_devices(ap-link);
+
+ for (i = 0; i max_devices; ++i) {
+ struct ata_device *dev = ap-link.device[i];
Better to use:
ok.
ata_link_for_each_dev(dev, ap-link) {
+
+
On Wednesday, 31 October 2007 03:27, Len Brown wrote:
It would be interseting if any of the folks having power consumption
problems when suspended see an improvement with this patch.
Are there plans to refresh this patch and get it upstream?
Acked-by: Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There was
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 14:26 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 October 2007 03:27, Len Brown wrote:
It would be interseting if any of the folks having power consumption
problems when suspended see an improvement with this patch.
Are there plans to refresh this patch and get
It would be interseting if any of the folks having power consumption
problems when suspended see an improvement with this patch.
Are there plans to refresh this patch and get it upstream?
Acked-by: Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks,
-Len
On Thursday 20 September 2007 22:17, Shaohua Li wrote:
Shaohua Li wrote:
ACPI spec (ver 3.0a, p289) requires IDE power on/off executes ACPI _PSx
methods. As recently most PATA drivers use libata, this patch adds _PSx
method support in libata. ACPI spec doesn't mention if SATA requires the
same _PSx method, but executing _PSx for SATA should be ok I
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 18:00 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Shaohua Li wrote:
ACPI spec (ver 3.0a, p289) requires IDE power on/off executes ACPI _PSx
methods. As recently most PATA drivers use libata, this patch adds _PSx
method support in libata. ACPI spec doesn't mention if SATA requires the
Hello,
Shaohua Li wrote:
+ /* channel first and then drives for power on and verse versa for power
off */
+ if (state.event == PM_EVENT_ON)
+ acpi_bus_set_power(ap-acpi_handle, ACPI_STATE_D0);
+
+ if (ap-flags ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS)
+ max_devices++;
ACPI spec (ver 3.0a, p289) requires IDE power on/off executes ACPI _PSx
methods. As recently most PATA drivers use libata, this patch adds _PSx
method support in libata. ACPI spec doesn't mention if SATA requires the
same _PSx method, but executing _PSx for SATA should be ok I think.
Shaohua Li wrote:
ACPI spec (ver 3.0a, p289) requires IDE power on/off executes ACPI _PSx
methods. As recently most PATA drivers use libata, this patch adds _PSx
method support in libata. ACPI spec doesn't mention if SATA requires the
same _PSx method, but executing _PSx for SATA should be ok I
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 23:21 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Shaohua Li wrote:
ACPI spec (ver 3.0a, p289) requires IDE power on/off executes ACPI _PSx
methods. As recently most PATA drivers use libata, this patch adds _PSx
method support in libata. ACPI spec doesn't mention if SATA requires the
15 matches
Mail list logo
