subject:"\[PATCH 05\/15\] libata\: rename ATA_PROT_ATAPI_\* to ATAPI_PROT_\*"

Re: [PATCH 05/15] libata: rename ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* to ATAPI_PROT_*

2007-12-18 Thread Jeff Garzik

Tejun Heo wrote: ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* are ugly and naming schemes between ATA_PROT_* and ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* are inconsistent causing confusion. Rename them to ATAPI_PROT_* and make them consistent with ATA counterpart. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/ata/libata-core.c |

[PATCH 05/15] libata: rename ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* to ATAPI_PROT_*

2007-12-04 Thread Tejun Heo

ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* are ugly and naming schemes between ATA_PROT_* and ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* are inconsistent causing confusion. Rename them to ATAPI_PROT_* and make them consistent with ATA counterpart. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 24