Re: [PATCH 13/15] ide: add ata_set{_max}_pio()

2007-06-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: * Add IDE_HFLAG_ABUSE_{PREFETCH,FAST_DEVSEL,DMA_MODES} flags and set them in ht6560, cmd640, cmd64x and sc1200 host drivers. * Add set_pio_mode_abuse() for checking if host driver has a non-standard -tuneproc() implementation and use it in do_special(). *

Re: [PATCH 13/15] ide: add ata_set{_max}_pio()

2007-06-30 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Hi, On Saturday 30 June 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: * Add IDE_HFLAG_ABUSE_{PREFETCH,FAST_DEVSEL,DMA_MODES} flags and set them in ht6560, cmd640, cmd64x and sc1200 host drivers. * Add set_pio_mode_abuse() for checking if host driver has a non-standard

Re: [PATCH 13/15] ide: add ata_set{_max}_pio()

2007-06-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: This has been changing recently since ide_ prefix seems to have negative emotional connotations. :-) New patches for drivers/ide should use exclusively the ata_ prefix. So this choice to be inconsistent was made based entirely on fashion? This is the same as

Re: [PATCH 13/15] ide: add ata_set{_max}_pio()

2007-06-30 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Saturday 30 June 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: This has been changing recently since ide_ prefix seems to have negative emotional connotations. :-) New patches for drivers/ide should use exclusively the ata_ prefix. So this choice to be inconsistent was

Re: [PATCH 13/15] ide: add ata_set{_max}_pio()

2007-06-30 Thread Alan Cox
This has been changing recently since ide_ prefix seems to have negative emotional connotations. :-) New patches for drivers/ide should use exclusively the ata_ prefix. Then I would ask that new patches for drivers/ide are all rejected by Andrew Morton until you change policy. I don't see