[PATCH 2/11] it8213/piix/slc90e66: remove {it8213,piix,slc90e66}_dma_2_pio()

2007-08-04 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/ide/pci/it8213.c | 44 +++- drivers/ide/pci/piix.c | 44 +++- drivers/ide/pci/slc90e66.c | 33 +++-- 3 f

Re: [PATCH 2/11] it8213/piix/slc90e66: remove {it8213,piix,slc90e66}_dma_2_pio()

2007-08-05 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sigh... when I was talking about getting rid of that function, I meant that we need to also decouple UltraDMA from PIO -- which is what this patch misses... Actually, I intended to dec

Re: [PATCH 2/11] it8213/piix/slc90e66: remove {it8213,piix,slc90e66}_dma_2_pio()

2007-08-09 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Sunday 05 August 2007, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sigh... when I was talking about getting rid of that function, I meant > that we need to also decouple UltraDMA from PIO -- w

Re: [PATCH 2/11] it8213/piix/slc90e66: remove {it8213,piix,slc90e66}_dma_2_pio()

2007-08-10 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sigh... when I was talking about getting rid of that function, I meant that we need to also decouple UltraDMA from PIO -- which is what this patch misses... Addressed in the follow-up patch.

Re: [PATCH 2/11] it8213/piix/slc90e66: remove {it8213,piix,slc90e66}_dma_2_pio()

2007-08-10 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MBR, Sergei - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-in