Albert Lee wrote:
After checking the current implementations of freeze()/thaw(), it seems only
pdc_freeze()
does more than simple irq masking. Remove the DMA stop code from pdc_freeze().
Signed-off-by: Albert Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -Nrup 01_remove_leftover_irqon/drivers/ata/sata_pro
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>
>>Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>>
>>>Albert's patch is OK as far as sata_promise is concerned, but
>>>I want to see an update of libata.tmpl and libata-eh.c to
>>>indicate the new, weakened, specification of freeze/thaw before
>>>I ACK this patch.
>
>
> Hmmm
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>> Albert's patch is OK as far as sata_promise is concerned, but
>> I want to see an update of libata.tmpl and libata-eh.c to
>> indicate the new, weakened, specification of freeze/thaw before
>> I ACK this patch.
Hmmm The docbook document is too sta
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Albert's patch is OK as far as sata_promise is concerned, but
> I want to see an update of libata.tmpl and libata-eh.c to
> indicate the new, weakened, specification of freeze/thaw before
> I ACK this patch.
Aye aye sir.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send t
On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 15:02:49 +0800, Albert Lee wrote:
> After checking the current implementations of freeze()/thaw(), it seems only
> pdc_freeze()
>does more than simple irq masking. Remove the DMA stop code from pdc_freeze().
>
>Signed-off-by: Albert Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>---
>
>diff -Nrup 01
After checking the current implementations of freeze()/thaw(), it seems only
pdc_freeze()
does more than simple irq masking. Remove the DMA stop code from pdc_freeze().
Signed-off-by: Albert Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -Nrup 01_remove_leftover_irqon/drivers/ata/sata_promise.c
02_sata_pdc_
