Hi,
On Tuesday 29 May 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The change itself looks good but IMO it is worth doing it before patch #2/3
> > (it would also make it possible for me to merge this patch immediately).
>
> Yes, I should have conside
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The change itself looks good but IMO it is worth doing it before patch #2/3
> (it would also make it possible for me to merge this patch immediately).
Yes, I should have considered that the earlier #2/3 needs
coordination between you and Jef
Hi,
On Tuesday 22 May 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Earlier, the matching of (model,rev) in ide-dma black/white list
> handling was to consider "ALL" in the table to match any
> revision. This changes the wildcard to NULL. This way, the
> DMA_BLACK_LIST macro used in the previous patch does not
Earlier, the matching of (model,rev) in ide-dma black/white list
handling was to consider "ALL" in the table to match any
revision. This changes the wildcard to NULL. This way, the
DMA_BLACK_LIST macro used in the previous patch does not have to
use a slightly funky compile time constant expressi
